[Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Further work with NNPDF

[Savvas Zafeiropoulos]

I think Joe's suggestion is to do something with NNPDF after we publish our
distillation data alone as hadstruc...
>From both the heavy and lighter pion masses...

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:03 PM Konstantinos Orginos <kostas at jlab.org>
wrote:

> In my view we should first let Colin write the paper publish it and then
> discuss further collaboration with NNPDF.
> By  adding new authors to a paper that is nearly complete is not in the
> best interests of  our own graduates students who  worked hard on this
> project
> and deserve a first take in analysing and publishing the data without
> external interference.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kostas.
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 2020, at 1:56 PM, Joseph Karpie <jkarpie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > As some of you may know, a few of us are wrapping up a paper with Luigi
> Del Debbio and Tommaso Giana (NNPDF people) where they reanalyse our
> Gaussian smeared results using their tools. Tommaso sent around a number of
> suggestions for things to begin studying next, such as studying fit forms
> and using only high or low Ioffe time data.
> >
> > They have experience using sophisticated methods to perform the inverse
> and ways of accounting for systematic errors which can be very useful to
> us. I think we should discuss Friday what future work we would like to be
> doing with them.
> >
> > For example, I'd like to do a comparison of our Gaussian smeared results
> with the distillation results that have been made on the same ensemble when
> they are finalized. My thought is that the data are more or less
> consistent, but Colin's fits appear to have significantly better agreement
> with pheno results in the x > 0.5 region than my own fits or Tommaso's
> NNPDF fits to the Gaussian smeared data. I want to understand what
> difference between the results created this dramatic improvement. I believe
> working with NNPDF would make this task significantly easier due to their
> experience and tools.
> >
> > Best,
> > Joe
> > _______________________________________________
> > Hadstruct mailing list
> > Hadstruct at jlab.org
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hadstruct mailing list
> Hadstruct at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hadstruct/attachments/20200922/174ec95d/attachment-0001.html>