[Hadstruct] Helicity Final Thoughts

[Konstantinos Orginos]

I agree!

K.

On Feb 21, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Anatoly Radyushkin via Hadstruct <hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>> wrote:

I recommend just bluntly answer that we want to publish the paper "as is",
without going  into discussions of  "why", i.e., justifications of this answer, motivations, etc.
________________________________
From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Colin Egerer via Hadstruct <hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:56 AM
To: hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org> <hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Hadstruct] Helicity Final Thoughts

Hi All,

I received a second message from our referee. I have attached the follow-up thoughts to this email.
In short, our debate between our way of thinking and that of our referee persists regarding perturbation theory. That said, the referee states we can publish without any further exchanges or modifications. Verbatim, the editor states:
"The referee raises important conceptual and semantic points that you may want to address in a revised version of your manuscript. I should point out that these revisions are optional: as indicated by the referee, the manuscript could also be published as is."
I'm of the opinion we proceed to publish. I appreciate any last lingering perspective you may have.

Best,
Colin
_______________________________________________
Hadstruct mailing list
Hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hadstruct/attachments/20230222/a51e0c2d/attachment.html>