[Halld-cal] [Halld-physics] GlueX-doc-1481 Impact of Fcal (insert) resolutions on eta production

[Gan, Liping]

Hi, Elton,

I just noticed that the position resolution you used for PWO in your calculation is 0.32cm/sqrt(E) (listed in Table 3), which is about 30% worse than the reality. The actual position resolution should be 0.25cm/sqrt(E).

Best regards,

Liping
________________________________________
From: halld-physics-bounces at jlab.org [halld-physics-bounces at jlab.org] On Behalf Of Elton Smith [elton at jlab.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 5:49 PM
To: halld-cal at jlab.org; halld-physics at jlab.org; Ashot Gasparian
Subject: [Halld-physics] GlueX-doc-1481 Impact of Fcal (insert) resolutions     on eta production

Dear collaborators,

I have submitted the first real draft of the "Impact of Fcal resolution
parameters on measurements of eta production" GlueX-doc-1481 for
discussion and feedback. It will be useful as backup information for
discussions next week at the collaboration meeting and also as we proceed
with making decisions on the radiation-hard insert for the FCAL.

Cheers, Elton.

Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
12000 Jefferson Ave
Suite # 16
Newport News, VA 23606
elton at jlab.org
(757) 269-7625
(757) 269-6331 fax
_______________________________________________
Halld-physics mailing list
Halld-physics at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-physics