[Halld-cal] svn updates

Elton Smith elton at jlab.org
Thu Jun 25 18:26:01 EDT 2015


HI Tegan,

Thanks for the updates. Did you change the daq threshold?

Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H3
12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7625
(757) 269-6331 fax

On 6/25/15 5:57 PM, beattite wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just checked in some changes to svn.
>
> The first is a change to the DBCALShower_factory_CURVATURE code. This 
> incorporates the changes recently made to include points which fell 
> outside of the BCAL, along with shower position averaging that ignores 
> layer four hits (as the IU code does). Also, I added the curvature 
> tables themselves to the libraries/BCAL folder, for lack of a better 
> place to put them (to my knowledge).  So, with this version, people 
> should be able to use the CURVATURE shower code.  Eventually, I think 
> we wanted to put the curvature tables in the database, but for the 
> time being, this will probably work for now.  This is revision 18889.
>
> The second is a change to mcsmear.  This incorporates the pulling of 
> attenuation lengths and effective speed of lights from the database in 
> the same way as DBCALPoint_factory does.  It'll pull values from 
> BCAL/attenuation_parameters in the ccdb.  This is revision 18890.
>
> Sean and I have changed the ccdb values for the attenuation length to 
> 525 for both the mc_parms and the attenuation_parameters;mc tables.
>
>
> If we don't want to use the newest version of mcsmear for the 
> simulations next week, then we can use a revision prior to this 
> check-in.  I think it should be fine to use the newest version, 
> though.  Most of the things I've done in the last few days have been 
> with this newest version, and it behaves just like the old version 
> from what I can tell.  For 'variation=mc,' it's the same as before, as 
> in, the attenuation length will always be some set number (previously 
> 310, now 525).  But, it can now also support using the default 
> attenuation lengths (those measured recently) if we'd like.
>
>
> If any of this is unclear, or if you have questions or concerns, let 
> me know.
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-cal mailing list
> Halld-cal at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal



More information about the Halld-cal mailing list