[Halld-cal] BCAL calibration 2016

[Mark Macrae Dalton]

Hi,

I have new calibration constants from 2016 data for the BCAL positions from the time differences.  Presumably this would address the issue that Mike observed.

I now wonder, is there any reason not to use the 2017 constants for the 2016?  (for effective velocities, timing, attenuation lengths etc.)  I cannot think of any myself.  I believe that we have already done this for the gains.  This is an already existing high statistics set of constants that gave good results on the 2017 data.

Best,
Mark Macrae Dalton



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cal/attachments/20171018/ca09548f/attachment.html>