[Halld-cal] revised calorimeter simulations

[Richard Jones]

Matt,

I redid the quadratic plots (see last ~10 slides) as (Ercecon - Egen) vs
Egen as you suggested. These plots show the residual nonlinearity better
than the earlier plots I had made for this talk.

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1MkzEAgbLTU-08P0iPWMm9vmikWEu8y6E1eVtU-HbyKE%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=u9mPWPBLs4jIOYIl2aUmz4FNlWugznempnIYLpurDSs%3D&reserved=0

-Richard

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:23 PM Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
wrote:

> Hello Matt,
>
> Ok, version 3 will be coming out shortly with these plots remade as delta
> E vs E.
>
> -Richard
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:33 PM Shepherd, Matthew <mashephe at indiana.edu>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I still think it would be useful to plot the deviation from a linear
>> response vs energy instead of the response vs energy.  The dominant trend
>> in these plots is one we already know, we’d like to focus on deviations
>> from this.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 8:54 PM, Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Calorimeter working group,
>>
>> I have finished redoing my MC single-photon response calibration study,
>> this time replacing the profile histograms with histograms where the
>> vertical axis is the centroid from a Gaussian fit and the error bar is the
>> sigma from the fit. The conclusions seem unaffected by the improved
>> analysis method.
>>
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1MkzEAgbLTU-08P0iPWMm9vmikWEu8y6E1eVtU-HbyKE%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=u9mPWPBLs4jIOYIl2aUmz4FNlWugznempnIYLpurDSs%3D&reserved=0
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1MkzEAgbLTU-08P0iPWMm9vmikWEu8y6E1eVtU-HbyKE%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=u9mPWPBLs4jIOYIl2aUmz4FNlWugznempnIYLpurDSs%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> The original study can be found here, for comparison.
>>
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1Ap0ifkk7GVCLq-EJuyXuSmxgsB2u-RNZmTU4et_WlFo%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=CKWqVcZFnF4HdgjqNqnpAoJdyLSGW0%2Bj6XScJM6kcqs%3D&reserved=0
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1Ap0ifkk7GVCLq-EJuyXuSmxgsB2u-RNZmTU4et_WlFo%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=CKWqVcZFnF4HdgjqNqnpAoJdyLSGW0%2Bj6XScJM6kcqs%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> -Richard Jones
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-cal mailing list
>> Halld-cal at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.jlab.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fhalld-cal&data=02%7C01%7Challd-cal%40jlab.org%7C0b890c5742ec4125082b08d69dfd74ff%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636870109245532029&sdata=j4yAsQMx8CqoeZ5v95NJMKfJsx3CyyWuqDjn90MoLOM%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cal/attachments/20190228/f08d7656/attachment.html>