[Halld-cal] updated FCAL mc response study
Shepherd, Matthew
mashephe at indiana.edu
Tue Mar 26 15:41:31 EDT 2019
Hi Richard,
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 7:28 AM, Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu> wrote:
> I understand your concern that something has changed in the MC, but other things could have changed as well, for example the cluster algorithm in the fcal or the nonlinear correction applied to the reconstructed fcal cluster energy. Any of these would change the behavior of the results I show.
The only changes appear to be in the code that deals with the MC response of the detector. The clustering algorithm hasn't change and the nonlinear correction is the very thing we are discussing: it worked, then it didn't.
We will retune once we get the green light that all low level changes have been made and propagated into the master for use.
Matt
More information about the Halld-cal
mailing list