[Halld-cal] [EXTERNAL] FCAL calibration follow-up
Shepherd, Matthew
mashephe at indiana.edu
Fri May 1 10:07:06 EDT 2020
Igal,
Because the pi0 fitting (which is of poor quality) is systematically biased by 1 to 2 MeV when he doing the energy dependence correction the pi0 mass is shifted to lower mass and falls within 2-3% around the pi0 PDG mass and stops there.
Please reference:
https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0043/004387/001/presentation.pdf
The left plot of slide 4 shows that if the average energy for photons used in making the pi0 peak varies, then the pi0 peak will vary by about +/- 1.5%. The pi0 mass on the left of slide 2 clearly averages over energies in a way that is location dependent.
It happens even with perfect fitting and in the absence of systematic bias. It is a pure byproduct of energy non-linearity and variation in average energy of photons from pi0 decays.
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cal/attachments/20200501/7fbe55ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Halld-cal
mailing list