<html><head>
</head><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Hi Elton:<br>
<br>
the picture below is in the proposal's body. The large footprint
perpendicular to the beam is due to the red stabilizer bars. If those
get in the way we can move them or adjust them. The rest is pretty
narrow. <br>
<br>
The 0-55 degree means horizontal (parallel to floor) and 55 w.r.t.
floor. In the proposal I explain what this implies vis a vis the
electron trajectories. I will take this out from the Exec Summary and
refer to the electrons instead.<br>
<br>
Thanks for the tips. I'll get them incorporated in a couple of hours or
less.<br>
<br>
Cheers, Zisis... <br>
<br>
<img alt="" src="cid:part1.08030502.08060708@uregina.ca"><br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:4F328AD8.70202@jlab.org">
<div class="__pbConvHr"><div> <div><img width="25px" height="25px" src="cid:part2.02050701.06020903@uregina.ca"></div> <div>
<a href="mailto:elton@jlab.org">Elton Smith</a></div> <div>
<font color="#9FA2A5">February 8, 2012
8:46 AM</font></div></div></div>
<div class="__pbConvBody" __pbrmquotes="true">Hi Zisis,
<br>
<br>Sorry, I initially only looked at your abstract and not at the
entire
executive summary.
<br>
<br>From the summary, I have a more fundamental question regarding the
orientation of the module relative to the tagger/electron beam. First
we are confused as to why the footprint along the beam is so large. You
mention that the angle adjustment is 0-50 deg. We assume that 0 deg
corresponds to the module positioned perpendicular to the electron
plane, but some of the description does not match this assumption. It
may be useful to send a sketch with some dimensions and angles indicate,
or you can call my office and we can work though the questions.
<br>
<br>Thanks, Elton.
<br>
<br><br></div>
<div class="__pbConvHr"><div> <div><img width="25px" height="25px" src="cid:part2.02050701.06020903@uregina.ca"></div> <div>
<a href="mailto:elton@jlab.org">Elton Smith</a></div> <div>
<font color="#9FA2A5">February 8, 2012
7:38 AM</font></div></div></div>
<div class="__pbConvBody" __pbrmquotes="true"><div>Hi Zisis,<br><br>The
summary sounds good. I would mention two additional things: 1) that <br>the
prototype is every way identical to the BCAL modules except for the <br>length.
2) operation in Hall B will be parasitic with the ongoing <br>experiment.<br><br>Cheers,
Elton.<br><br>Elton Smith<br>Jefferson Lab MS 12H5<br>12000 Jefferson
Ave<br>Suite #16<br>Newport News, VA 23606<br>(757) 269-7625<br>(757)
269-6331 fax<br><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>Halld-cal
mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Halld-cal@jlab.org">Halld-cal@jlab.org</a><br><a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal</a><br></div></div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>