<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Sean,<div><br></div><div>I don't think it makes sense to try to merge together the energy information for the tagger fixed array and the microscope. These will be updated by different groups and at different intervals, and the detector organizations are different so the structure of the tables will evolve independently. <img class="" src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif"></div>
<span class=""><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>-Richard Jones</div><div><br></div></font></span></div><div class=""><div class="adm" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"></div><div class="im" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Sean Dobbs <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:s-dobbs@northwestern.edu" target="_blank">s-dobbs@northwestern.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Richard,<br><br>I'm glad to hear that those results are ready to go into the CCDB. From our previous discussion I had thought it would be more convenient for the simulation/reconstruction code to read the scaled energy values from one table, which is the intent for the "scaled_energy_range" table at the top level. The tables for the microscope and fixed array would be intermediate storage areas which would be collated into the table at the top level. If you'd rather go with just the two separate tables, we can drop the top level one. <div>
<br></div><div>As for the missing pair spectrometer tables, I must have missed them. If you can let me know what you need, I'll go ahead and add them. </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<span></span></div><div>Sean<div>
<div class="h5"><br><br>
On Saturday, June 28, 2014, Richard Jones <<a href="mailto:richard.t.jones@uconn.edu" target="_blank">richard.t.jones@uconn.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hello Sean and all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In browsing through the ccdb tables for the Photon Beam, most of the tables make sense, but one of them seems out of place. There are "scaled_energy_range" tables for each of the microscope and fixed_array, but there is none for the pair_spectrometer.
However, there is a scaled_energy_range table at the top level of PHOTON_BEAM with 340 elements. What is that? Does that belong under pair_spectometer? If not, what does it mean? Where is the energy calibration of the pair spectrometer? We should have energies
for right and left fine-segmentation counters in the PS.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am about to enter some initial values in the scaled_energy_range tables for the tagger microscope and fixed array, based on work done recently by Dan Sober, so I can use these to write the correct tag hits in hdgeant. I want to make sure I put my numbers
in the right spot that you foresaw for them. I think I understand everything you have put in there except what I highlight above.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>thanks,</div>
<div>-Richard Jones</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Sean Dobbs<br>Department of Physics & Astronomy <br>Northwestern University<br>phone: <a href="tel:847-467-2826" value="+18474672826" target="_blank">847-467-2826</a></div>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>