<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
Hello, Sean,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
So far I only looked at the individual gg invariant mass for each cell and regroup it per layers in the python script mentioned above. If you look at this script, you can see that for the 3<span><sup>rd</sup> layer, there are two groups with one very low statistics
and another with low statistics wrt other layers. </span><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
BCAL experts, <br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
Are there any diagnostics histograms that we can look for? Also, is there a table or code that gives the COG of each cell?<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
tks ig.<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Sean Dobbs <sdobbs@jlab.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, June 27, 2023 10:35 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca>; halld-cal@jlab.org <halld-cal@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca>; Benedikt Zihlmann <zihlmann@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Halld-cal] [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi Igal,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the update. Do you have any diagnostics for the separate<br>
layers, so we can see the status of e.g. in layer 3?<br>
<br>
We may want to think about looking at expanded track/shower matching<br>
criteria for this analysis, or see what the effect of possible<br>
improvements in tracking or other BCAL calibrations are.<br>
<br>
---Sean<br>
<br>
---Sean<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:43 PM Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org> wrote:<br>
><br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> After a week's break, I am coming back to this task.<br>
><br>
> In short, the status is the following, the 3rd layer, cannot be calibrated with and without the trigger bit used (1 / FCAL+BCAL or 3 / BCAL alone).<br>
><br>
> Iteration 20 of period 3 (<a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/3/">https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/3/</a>) shows the results when using the trigger bits 1/3. And the individual cell gg inv. mass for each layers are
aslo there *.py files.<br>
><br>
> It seems (for this last iteration) layers 1 and 2 did converge but the background level remains the same as before ...<br>
><br>
> Any new inputs?<br>
><br>
> tks ig.<br>
><br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 7:33 PM<br>
> To: Sean Dobbs <sdobbs@jlab.org><br>
> Cc: soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca>; halld-cal@jlab.org <halld-cal@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca>; Benedikt Zihlmann <zihlmann@jlab.org><br>
> Subject: Re: [Halld-cal] [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
><br>
> Thank you, Sean, I will let you know if it is improving things.<br>
><br>
> tks ig.<br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: Sean Dobbs <sdobbs@jlab.org><br>
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 12:06 PM<br>
> To: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
> Cc: soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca>; halld-cal@jlab.org <halld-cal@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca>; Benedikt Zihlmann <zihlmann@jlab.org><br>
> Subject: Re: [Halld-cal] [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
><br>
> Hi Igal,<br>
><br>
> As a follow-up, currently there is ~10% of the CPP run skimmed out<br>
> including the trigger data in:<br>
> /cache/halld/RunPeriod-2022-05/calib/ver02/BCAL_pi0<br>
><br>
> So you should be able to look and see if you are getting a better pi0<br>
> peak by selecting e.g. the BCAL-FCAL trigger, and how that affects the<br>
> total statistics of the measurement.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Sean<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:31 AM Sean Dobbs <sdobbs@jlab.org> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Igal,<br>
> ><br>
> > For what it's worth, I started skimming the data to include the<br>
> > trigger information. The whole data set will probably take a couple<br>
> > of weeks, but I'll let you know when there's enough data to get some<br>
> > feeling for how the signal/background might improve - this will<br>
> > probably be a couple of days.<br>
> ><br>
> > Cheers,<br>
> > Sean<br>
> ><br>
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:08 AM Igal Jaegle via Halld-cal<br>
> > <halld-cal@jlab.org> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > All,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I made a test for period 3, <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/3/pi0gainmatrix_11.pdf">
https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/3/pi0gainmatrix_11.pdf</a><br>
> > ><br>
> > > I started with period 1 table. As you can see between iteration 0 and 4, there is no changes. Then, I put the ADC gain for all L3 cells to the default value (3.5e-05 - after each iteration). And between iteration 5 to 11, the behavior starts to converge
but not as well as when a pi0 signal is seen in L3. I will try to use for all L3 cells, the average gain instead of the default value for iteration 12 and above. Let me know if you have a better idea.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > tks ig.<br>
> > > ________________________________<br>
> > > From: soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca><br>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 1:38 PM<br>
> > > To: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
> > > Cc: Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca>; Mark Macrae Dalton <dalton@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Zisis Papandreou <zisis@uregina.ca><br>
> > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Hello Igal,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I looked at the layer 3 plots, and indeed, they don't seem to be<br>
> > > converging. Even the fits in the 2y reconstructed mass look very weird<br>
> > > and don't seem to improve per iteration. This is probably very closely<br>
> > > related to the aforementioned issues with Layer 3. Usually I've never<br>
> > > seen this behaviour for the background and total fits, as things looked<br>
> > > rather clean for other experiments (see attached Be target from PrimEx).<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Also, looking at the coefficient of variation vs. iteration plot, there<br>
> > > is a big drop in the last iteration, which doesn't really reflect in the<br>
> > > other plots (it's essentially zero), so I'm not sure why that happened.<br>
> > > Currently, I'm not sure what advice to give for layer 3, since it seems<br>
> > > to be a complexity related to the CPP/NPP experiment conditions. Maybe<br>
> > > someone can give additional comments on this.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Best regards,<br>
> > > Stjepan<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On 2023-06-10 10:47, Igal Jaegle wrote:<br>
> > > > Thank you, Karthik, for your input. Ok, the 12th iteration finished<br>
> > > > this morning, layer 1 and 2 did converge although their bands seems<br>
> > > > larger than what you are usually showing. The 3rd layer is all over<br>
> > > > the place because no pi0 resonance is seen, look at<br>
> > > > l3_gain_checking_1.py. What is your advice in this case?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > tks ig.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > -------------------------<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > From: Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca><br>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 11:45 PM<br>
> > > > To: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
> > > > Cc: soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca>; Mark Macrae Dalton <dalton@jlab.org>;<br>
> > > > Rory Miskimen <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Zisis Papandreou<br>
> > > > <zisis@uregina.ca><br>
> > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Good evening Igal,<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > The current procedure is such that the convergence could be slow (due<br>
> > > > the the iterative nature). Also, I doubt if the third layer can be<br>
> > > > calibrated within 1% precision with this method. But I think we could<br>
> > > > conclude that after a few more iterations.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Thank you<br>
> > > > Karthik Suresh<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > On 2023-06-09 21:26, Igal Jaegle wrote:<br>
> > > >> Thank you, Stjepan, for your answer and help. It seems very slowly<br>
> > > >> converging, see the latest report 8. The first values were not so<br>
> > > > bad,<br>
> > > >> then I did a mistake in the new gain calculation, correct it, then<br>
> > > > it<br>
> > > >> seems to slowly recover but very slowly. Could it be due to the 3rd<br>
> > > >> layer seeing no pi0s? What should be done to the 3rd layer, put<br>
> > > >> default values or the values of the run period precede it or succeed<br>
> > > >> it? What is your suggestion for the 3rd layer?<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> tks ig.<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> -------------------------<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> From: soy062 <soy062@uregina.ca><br>
> > > >> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:56 PM<br>
> > > >> To: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle@jlab.org><br>
> > > >> Cc: Mark Macrae Dalton <dalton@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen<br>
> > > >> <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Zisis Papandreou <zisis@uregina.ca>;<br>
> > > >> Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca><br>
> > > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> Hi Igal,<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> Sorry for the delayed response. The histograms in the "fit" ROOT<br>
> > > > file<br>
> > > >> are arranged in a cyclical way. For example, starting from 1 to 4<br>
> > > >> (channel number) would be layer 1, 5 to 8 would be layer 2, 9 to 12<br>
> > > >> would be layer 3, 13 to 16 would be layer 4 and then for 17 to 20 we<br>
> > > >> go<br>
> > > >> back to layer 1. The final one is 763.<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> Looking at the plots (pi0gainmatrix.pdf), there seems to be<br>
> > > > something<br>
> > > >> missing in the pipeline. Basically for each iteration the pi0 mass<br>
> > > > is<br>
> > > >> not converging, which means that somewhere along the way the local<br>
> > > >> ccdb<br>
> > > >> gain constants are not getting updated after each iteration or the<br>
> > > >> local<br>
> > > >> ccdb is not getting copied to the right location. This can be seen<br>
> > > > for<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> example in the sigma/mean vs iteration plot, it is constant, which<br>
> > > > it<br>
> > > >> should not be.<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> Best regards,<br>
> > > >> Stjepan<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> On 2023-06-09 16:45, Igal Jaegle wrote:<br>
> > > >>> Bump!<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> -------------------------<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> From: Igal Jaegle<br>
> > > >>> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 9:20 PM<br>
> > > >>> To: Mark Macrae Dalton <dalton@jlab.org>; Rory Miskimen<br>
> > > >>> <miskimen@physics.umass.edu>; Zisis Papandreou <zisis@uregina.ca>;<br>
> > > >>> Karthik Suresh <ksv656@uregina.ca>; Stjepan Orešić<br>
> > > >>> <soy062@uregina.ca><br>
> > > >>> Subject: CPP/NPP BCAL calibration status<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> All,<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> I am testing the upgrades of the BCAL gain calibration procedure.<br>
> > > >> The<br>
> > > >>> upgrades free the calibrator of all interventions between each<br>
> > > >>> iteration making the calibration fully automized. I made a wiki<br>
> > > >> which<br>
> > > >>> can be accessed from<br>
> > > >>> <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page">https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</a> [1] go to,<br>
> > > > Barrel<br>
> > > >>> Carolimter, pi0 gain calibration, and CPP/NPP (2022-05) BCAL pi0<br>
> > > >>> calibration [2]<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> The report and individual fit can be found here:<br>
> > > >>> <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/1/">https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/1/</a> [3]<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> Stjepan/Karthik, how the layer ordering is working? 1 to 512 first<br>
> > > >>> layer, 513 to 1024 2nd layer, and 1025 to 1534 3rd layer? The 3rd<br>
> > > >> sees<br>
> > > >>> nothing is that an issue? How to solve it? Or leave with it?<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> tks ig<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >>> Links:<br>
> > > >>> ------<br>
> > > >>> [1] <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page">https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</a><br>
> > > >>> [2]<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > > <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration">
https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration</a><br>
> > > > [1]<br>
> > > >> [1]<br>
> > > >>> [3] <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/1/">https://halldweb.jlab.org/primexd/bcal-cal/2022-05/1/</a><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> Links:<br>
> > > >> ------<br>
> > > >> [1]<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > > <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration">
https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration</a><br>
> > > > [1]<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > --<br>
> > > > Karthik Suresh<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Links:<br>
> > > > ------<br>
> > > > [1]<br>
> > > > <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration">
https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/CPP/NPP_(2022-05)_BCAL_pi0_calibration</a><br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > Halld-cal mailing list<br>
> > > Halld-cal@jlab.org<br>
> > > <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal__;!!PhOWcWs!wYZI7-yOAXDQlAlPpt0G3TedPB6zwn2MIOjbMWzG5i0OGwZK1kL-sMDmTYC8wJn7lESuYRotVEIyIlK4$">
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-cal__;!!PhOWcWs!wYZI7-yOAXDQlAlPpt0G3TedPB6zwn2MIOjbMWzG5i0OGwZK1kL-sMDmTYC8wJn7lESuYRotVEIyIlK4$</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>