[Halld-controls] Options for Hall D solenoid quench detector
Elliott Wolin
wolin at jlab.org
Fri Nov 11 15:27:53 EST 2011
Hi,
Below I discuss issues concerning how to proceed with the quench
detector for the Hall D solenoid.
Recall the concern is that we currently do not know the coil inductances
in the final configuration, and the Danfysik QD only works if the
sections being compared have a good inductance match. I am not sure how
well they have to match, but Fernando thinks that 10% differences can be
handled easily.
Note that the main problem, as I understand it, is that if you have to
bias the Danfysik a lot so it does not trip during a normal ramp-up, and
you want to maintain good sensitivity, it will likely trip and cause a
fast dump during a normal ramp-down (Fernando or Mark can elaborate if
needed).
Floyd is quite busy with other things and it probably will be a few
months before he can work on the coil inductances. My worry is that by
the time we find out about the inductances it might be too late to do
something about it before we need to start commissioning the solenoid.
After talking with Fernando and Ben I've learned the following
concerning the situation where the Danfysik QD will not work (Fernando
and Ben...please correct me if I misunderstood something):
- For various reasons Fernando does not think we should try to modify
the Danfysik QD to handle large inductance imbalances.
- If we need to build another QD, Fernando and Ben think the best
strategy is to use a micro-controller based design, rather than an
FPGA-based or an analog design. This is because of the wide variety of
micro-controller boards available, including many with suitable A/D's
build into their front-ends.
- A new design should easily handle large inductance imbalances.
- Both believe micro-controllers are robust and reliable from a safety
standpoint as they are used in many safety-related applications.
- If we go with a micro-controller, time to design/procure/build/test is
4 months, EE manpower needed is 1 man-month.
- More time and manpower would be required if we went with and
FPGA-based or analog design.
- I don't know whether our safety reviewers will accept a
micro-controller based QD (or even if they'd accept a home-built one at
all!).
- Fernando is a little dubious about contracting with Danfysik to have
them build us a custom QD matched to our solenoid.
- I have no idea if there are other companies who build or can
design/build QD's.
Finally, from past experience Floyd's simulations have proven to be
accurate at the 10% level or so (Josh...please verify), which means
there is a risk that even if the simulations say the Danfysik QD will
work, in practice it may not.
If I take 1-Jun-2012 as the required date for a new QD (leaving time for
commissioning before we begin solenoid testing), then the latest
possible time to know about the inductances is 1-Feb-2012. This assumes
the 4 month estimate is accurate, and that we can get one man-month of
EE time from an experienced designer starting 1-Feb-2012. Building in
some float gives 1-Jan-2012, which of course is just around the corner.
If we can wait until 1-Aug to get the new QD then the simulations need
to be completed perhaps as late as 1-Apr-2012.
_Options_
1. Do nothing yet, hope Floyd completes the simulations in time to
build another QD and that EE manpower is available if and when needed.
2. Plan to design and build another QD. In this case we do not need
Floyd to simulate the inductances since we can measure them in situ and
adjust the new QD appropriately. Also, there is plenty of time to do
the work if we get going now.
3. Do nothing, accept fast dump trips during normal ramp-downs.
Comments, criticisms, corrections, alternate strategies...?
Thanks,
--
Sincerely,
Elliott
================================================================================
Those raised in a morally relative or neutral environment will hold
no truths to be self-evident.
Elliott Wolin
Staff Physicist, Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Suite 8 MS 12A1
Newport News, VA 23606
757-269-7365
================================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-controls/attachments/20111111/0ff19b06/attachment.html
More information about the Halld-controls
mailing list