[Halld-cpp] Proposed CPP NPP run status database change

[Ilya Larin]

Hi Sean,

yes, that's right., confirmed.

 Ilya

________________________________
From: Sean Dobbs <sdobbs at fsu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 17:53
To: Ilya Larin <ilarin at jlab.org>; Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu>; Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org>
Cc: halld-cpp at jlab.org <halld-cpp at jlab.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Proposed CPP NPP run status database change

Hi Ilya,

Thanks for bringing this up.  I'll review the document and make some changes early next week.

Just to confirm, for the first group of runs, you want them set to status=0 (bad and should not be used by anyone) and status=6 for the second two groups (only good for use by NPP)?

Cheers,
Sean
________________________________
From: Ilya Larin <ilarin at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 5:29 PM
To: Sean Dobbs <sdobbs at fsu.edu>; Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu>; Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org>
Cc: halld-cpp at jlab.org <halld-cpp at jlab.org>
Subject: Proposed CPP NPP run status database change

Hi Sean,
I believe we should update the CPP NPP run status database based on my observations as follows:
Currently good, but actually bad:
100532, 100772, 100773, 100787, 100833, (100855...100861), 100981,
101067, 101076, 101130, 101137, 101268, 101387, 101388, 101429
(100716...100735)
(101154...101157)
Currently good, but actually good for NPP only:
100846, 100847, 101343
Good for NPP only (not sure about the current status):
100660, 100661, 100771, 101018, 101023, 101035, 101040, 101064, 101080,
101086, 101293, 101536, 101598, 101616, 101617, 101618
I’ve included further details in GlueX document 6702.
Thank you and all the best,
Ilya

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cpp/attachments/20241213/12a25c0c/attachment.html>