<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi Naomi,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">If we take data continuously for 2 h at 60 kHz, we accumulate about 430 M events. Of course it is unusual to have 100% beam. Looking at the recent history of runs and number of triggers accumulated, it looks like a “good” run has about 300 M triggers.
If we take the canonical 50% efficiency (accelerator/detector), we might estimate 215M events. Here is a suggestion: Aim for 240 M events per setting for polarized beam (may be less than 2 h) and 60 M for amorphous radiator. So the sequence would be the following:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<div class=""><span class="" style="color: rgb(49, 49, 49); font-family: "Trebuchet MS", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Diamond 45(240 M events)/ Diamond 45(240 M)/Diamond 135( 240 M)/Diamond
135(240 M)/AMO(60 M)</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
As Rory mentioned this morning, we would</div>
<div class="">1. take about 6 days of full-target data; </div>
<div class="">2. switch to empty target for about a day. </div>
<div class="">3. Take about 10% of the triggers accumulated during full target. </div>
<div class="">4. Switch back to full target. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Obviously, this rough schedule can be tweaked as we see what the data look like.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Thanks, Elton.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div>
<div class="">------------------------------------</div>
<div class="">Elton Smith</div>
<div class="">Jefferson Lab MS 12H3</div>
<div class="">12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4</div>
<div class="">Newport News, VA 23606</div>
<div class="">(757)269-7625</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 23, 2022, at 8:43 AM, Naomi Jarvis <<a href="mailto:nsj@cmu.edu" class="">nsj@cmu.edu</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">That looks good to me, except that it would be easier for the shifters if you express it in triggers rather than time. <br class="">
The runs shouldn't go over 2h anyway. Maybe it would be easier to aim for a little less than 2h per run to allow for some down time for beam trips etc.
<div class=""><br class="">
<div class="">Last night I had them aiming for 150M triggers in the hope that they would get through 4 diamonds + maybe a little amo time before beam-down but there were so many daq problems that this didn't happen. </div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Naomi.</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:29 AM Elton Smith <<a href="mailto:elton@jlab.org" class="">elton@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" class="">I received some feedback from Sean, Curtis, Alexandre and Alexander regarding the amount of amorphous radiator data needed.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Another reason for having empty target data that I had overlooked is that it proves very useful for MONITORING. For example, see Alexandre’s log entry <a href="https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4006041" target="_blank" class="">https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4006041</a>.
Alexander points out that we need regular amorphous data in order to normalize the coherent peak spectrum, which is used for monitoring during data taking. The consensus is that we may not need as much data as was taken for GlueX. Let me make the following
proposal for the taking full-target data:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Sequence for Full-Target Data</div>
<div class=""><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);font-family:"Trebuchet MS","Helvetica Neue",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class="">Diamond 45(2h)/ Diamond 45(2h)/Diamond 135(2h)/Diamond 135(2h)/AMO(0.5 h). That
results in 0.5/8.5h = 6% of time allocated to amorphous running. It also makes sure that we take the data uniformly through the running period.</span></div>
<div class=""><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);font-family:"Trebuchet MS","Helvetica Neue",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><br class="">
</span></div>
<div class=""><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><font color="#313131" face="Trebuchet MS, Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size:14px" class="">I am inclined to continue the SAME sequence of data
taking for empty target, including the amorphous running, so that we have consistent sets between full and empty. </span></font></span></div>
<div class=""><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><font color="#313131" face="Trebuchet MS, Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size:14px" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></span></div>
<div class=""><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><font color="#313131" face="Trebuchet MS, Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size:14px" class="">Thoughts/comments?</span></font></span></div>
<div class=""><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><font color="#313131" face="Trebuchet MS, Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size:14px" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></span></div>
<div class=""><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" class=""><font color="#313131" face="Trebuchet MS, Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size:14px" class="">Cheers, Elton</span></font></span></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">------------------------------------</div>
<div class="">Elton Smith</div>
<div class="">Jefferson Lab MS 12H3</div>
<div class="">12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4</div>
<div class="">Newport News, VA 23606</div>
<div class="">(757)269-7625</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 22, 2022, at 5:31 PM, Sean Dobbs <<a href="mailto:sdobbs@jlab.org" target="_blank" class="">sdobbs@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">Hi Elton,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Another thing we use the amorphous data for is to evaluate instrumental asymmetries. This may be something to be concerned about since you're looking at tracks at small angles, but I also agree that for this you probably need less data than we
have been taking.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Cheers,</div>
<div class="">Sean</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:05 PM Curtis A. Meyer <<a href="mailto:cmeyer@cmu.edu" target="_blank" class="">cmeyer@cmu.edu</a>> wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" class="">Hi Elton,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> I think we have used the amorphous data to also check systematics when we analyze data away from the coherent peak. My guess is you probably need less than GlueX.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Curtis<br class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none" class="">
<div dir="auto" style="letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
<br class="">
<div id="gmail-m_-5768687354035354248gmail-m_-188018641450050986theme-6" style="opacity:1" class="">
<div class=""><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10px;line-height:12px;color:rgb(33,33,33);display:block" class=""><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:1.4em;line-height:1em;color:rgb(204,0,43)" class="">Curtis
A. Meyer</span><span class=""> </span>|<span class=""> </span><span style="font-size:1.2em;line-height:1.2em" class="">MCS Associate Dean for Research<span class=""> </span><br class="">
The Otto Stern Professor of Physics<span class=""> </span></span><br class="">
<a href="mailto:cmeyer@cmu.edu" style="color:rgb(71,124,204);text-decoration:none;display:inline" target="_blank" class="">cmeyer@cmu.edu</a><span class=""> </span>|<span class=""> </span>412 260 6290</span>
<div style="margin:0px;padding:0px;line-height:10px;width:219px;font-size:1px" class="">
<img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/htmlsig-assets/spacer.gif" width="508" height="10" style="display: block; width: 219px; height: 5px;" class=""></div>
<span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10px;line-height:12px;display:block" class=""><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(204,0,43)" class="">Carnegie Mellon University</span><span class=""> </span><br class="">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33)" class=""></span><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33)" class=""></span><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33)" class="">Department of Physics, Wean Hall 8410</span><span class=""> </span><br class="">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33)" class="">5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh PA, 15213</span><span class=""> </span><br class="">
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.curtismeyer.com&d=DwMFAg&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=_G1S4SWp4fMj0LNNDBuhBg&m=HRiyoxfOJd_BOwdN44qIWbkRnWNMfWjvMC09D_3AGF0VpHlkWj47Ep4xYqgVnHY8&s=wLOE_B9_Rhjb0vYKlpn_bjPw7n7q2BwbT3ShEX0zo9I&e=" style="color:rgb(71,124,204);text-decoration:none;display:inline" target="_blank" class="">www.curtismeyer.com</a>
<div style="margin:0px;padding:0px;line-height:10px;width:219px;font-size:1px" class="">
<img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/htmlsig-assets/spacer.gif" width="508" height="10" style="display: block; width: 219px; height: 5px;" class=""></div>
</span><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;line-height:9px;font-size:1px;display:block;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif" class=""></span>
<div style="margin:0px;padding:0px;line-height:10px;width:219px;font-size:1px" class="">
<img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/htmlsig-assets/spacer.gif" width="508" height="10" style="display: block; width: 219px; height: 5px;" class=""></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 22, 2022, at 16:57, Elton Smith <<a href="mailto:elton@jlab.org" target="_blank" class="">elton@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">Dear Hovanes, Mike, and others,<br class="">
<br class="">
The CPP experiment has been considering how much data should be taken with the amorphous radiator and wanted to get your input. As you know, for GlueX we collected about 10% of the triggers on the amorphous radiator.
<br class="">
<br class="">
As, I understand it, the main arguments for collecting data with an amorphous radiator are a) to be able to normalize the coherent spectrum and b) check systematics of the polarization. We need very little data for a), but how much data we need to address
b)? Also, if there are other used for the amorphous radiator data, please send us feedback.
<br class="">
<br class="">
We have already started taking data that can be considered production and all of it was taken using polarized beam. We will want to make a plan regarding how much amorphous radiator data we take so that it is interspersed with diamond radiator data. At the
moment, we do not anticipate using the amorphous radiator data in the physics analyzes for CPP nor NPP. <br class="">
<br class="">
Thanks, Elton.<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
------------------------------------<br class="">
Elton Smith<br class="">
Jefferson Lab MS 12H3<br class="">
12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4<br class="">
Newport News, VA 23606<br class="">
(757)269-7625<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>