<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=koi8-r">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Thank you, Elton and Jose.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The point I missed is that Mpipi doesn't have a spread in that case, unlike photoproduction</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
on fixed target and defined by cm energy of colliding gammas.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
If Elton can send his cross-section points, I can redo my calculations for them or</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I can do it with the experimental points from that article. I will also</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
double-check everything in my calculations today. It would be also interesting to compare</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
with Elton's value obtained with form factors that I calculated last week.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
All the best,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Ilya<br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>От:</b> Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org><br>
<b>Отправлено:</b> 2 марта 2020 г. 7:48<br>
<b>Кому:</b> Ilya Larin <ilarin@jlab.org><br>
<b>Копия:</b> Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org>; Halld-npp@jlab.org <Halld-npp@jlab.org><br>
<b>Тема:</b> Re: Primakoff cross section</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
<div class="PlainText">Hi Ilya,<br>
<br>
The cross section sigma(gg -> pipi) is a two body reaction, so the <br>
energy dependence can be expressed as a function of the cm energy <br>
(Wpipi). It is the cross section as a function of energy but not <br>
differential in that variable. It reproduces the Crystal Ball Fig. 8 <br>
data (see attachment). Note the dimensions of nb. From Eq. 4 of the <br>
proposal (see attached) you can check the dimensions, which is nb.<br>
<br>
Hope this helps. We need to agree on this cross section. Thanks, Elton.<br>
<br>
Elton Smith<br>
Jefferson Lab MS 12H3<br>
12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4<br>
Newport News, VA 23606<br>
(757)269-7625<br>
(757)269-6331 fax<br>
<br>
On 3/1/20 6:06 AM, Ilya Larin wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Elton,<br>
><br>
> I can just comment that the 200 nb value I got has already a factor of <br>
> 1.25 taken into account.<br>
> I also do not quite understand (maybe because it's 6 am already) why <br>
> in Fig. 3 the units<br>
> are nb, not nb/GeV, maybe it is nb per histogram bin size, which is <br>
> 50MeV I assume, or something else. Having Fig. 3 understood is <br>
> essential for the cross-section results comparison,<br>
> because I used values from Jose and can/should put Fig. 3 values <br>
> instead to compare the results directly.<br>
><br>
> Thank you,<br>
> Ilya<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *От:* Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org><br>
> *Отправлено:* 28 февраля 2020 г. 15:15<br>
> *Кому:* Elton Smith <elton@jlab.org><br>
> *Копия:* Halld-npp@jlab.org <Halld-npp@jlab.org>; Ilya Larin <br>
> <ilarin@jlab.org><br>
> *Тема:* Primakoff cross section<br>
> Hi Ilya,<br>
><br>
> I compared your calculation of the cross section in the LOI. See figs.<br>
> 3-5. I get a cross section/nucleus of 345 nb. If you took Jose's cross<br>
> section directly, you need to divide your value 200 nb by 0.8 since it<br>
> is for |costhe|<0.8, which gives 250 nb, or 70% of my value.<br>
><br>
> You can check my parameterization of sigma(gg->pi0pi0) (Fig. 3) with<br>
> Jose's. I assumed it is essentially flat above the threshold instead of<br>
> having a shape. This may explain most of the remaining discrepancy. We<br>
> may wish to update the document with your value since Jose's<br>
> parameterization is more constrained, but we can discuss this.<br>
><br>
> Cheers, Elton.<br>
><br>
> Elton Smith<br>
> Jefferson Lab MS 12H3<br>
> 12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4<br>
> Newport News, VA 23606<br>
> (757)269-7625<br>
> (757)269-6331 fax<br>
><br>
> On 2/28/20 2:36 PM, Elton Smith wrote:<br>
> > Dear collaborators,<br>
> ><br>
> > I have posted the minutes from the NPP meeting this morning on the<br>
> > wiki at<br>
> > <br>
> <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Pi0_Polarizability_Meeting_Feb_28,_2020#Minutes">
https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Pi0_Polarizability_Meeting_Feb_28,_2020#Minutes</a>.
<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Ilya: You can go ahead an link your presentation directly to the<br>
> > meeting page.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks, Elton.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>