[Halld-offline] number for total acceptance?

[Craig Bookwalter]

That's all I'm looking for--30% for 3pi sounds good to me. Thanks!


On 10/17/2010 11:57 PM, David Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
>     I didn't see anyone respond to this yet. What I can tell you is 
> that Jake Bennet at IU has recently seen about a 30% reconstruction 
> efficiency for the 3pi channel. This is consistent with the computing 
> plan, though that number was considered a very conservative estimate. 
> The geometric acceptance is much higher (~70% range) though dependent 
> on the specific channel and whether you're looking at exclusive or 
> inclusive reactions. I hope this helps some.
>
> Regards,
> -Dave
>
> On 10/15/10 3:47 PM, Craig Bookwalter wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>      Just wondering if anyone can give me a rough estimate of the total
>> acceptance of the GlueX detector--40%, 50%, something like this? I'm
>> trying to figure out how many events I need to generate to get a decent
>> PWA-able dataset after acceptance.
>>
>> --cb
>>
>>      
>
> -- 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Craig Bookwalter			FSU Office:  (850) 644 3808
  Department of Physics			JLab Office: (757) 269 5465
  Florida State University		craigb at hadron.physics.fsu.edu
  Tallahasse, FL 32306			craigb at jlab.org		

"One toke? You poor fool. Just wait till you see those (expletive) bats."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20101018/08958253/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 5292 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20101018/08958253/attachment-0002.gif>