[Halld-offline] Physics Analysis Library Feedback

[Paul Mattione]

I'm going to give a talk at the upcoming collaboration meeting about the new physics analysis library tools (the kinematic fitter and the analysis framework), but before then I'd like to get some more feedback on them from the early-adopters, such as any limitations they may place on the way you'd like to do your analysis, or any improvements that you'd like to see.  

Specifically, if you're using these tools I would be interested to know:

1) That you're using it, and what analysis(es) you're trying to do, in order to learn more about the current user-base.  
2) Any problems you've had trying to setup, customize, or perform your analysis.  
3) Any limitations the structure of the analysis framework places that prevents you from performing your analysis how you'd like to (i.e. should some classes/etc. be re-organized differently to make your work easier).  
4) Anything that you think could be made more intuitive for users to do or understand.  
5) Any new features you'd like to see.  
6) Any gaps in the documentation (https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Mattione_GlueX_Analysis_Factories).  
7) Any other comments or recommendations you'd like to add.  

Any feedback you'd like to give will be appreciated, so please let me know what you think.  The earlier I can make improvements, the easier everything will be later on.  Thanks.  

 - Paul