[Halld-offline] not fully checked, don't want to release right now.

[Mark Ito]

Richard,

OK that sounds good. After all we are talking about an increase in 
efficiency in a monitoring step, so I agree that we can proceed.

Thanks a lot for giving it a go. BTW, it would not be crazy to bring 
this on mid-challenge, but realistically I think we will be OK without it.

So it's dc-2.7 y'all. Here we go...

   -- Mark

On 03/21/2014 04:33 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> There was more coding needed than I had thought there would be to make 
> the integrity check work properly for rest files.  I have a draft of 
> the code, and the event counter/checker, but it is not fully vetted 
> and I don't want to release something untested for the dc.  I suggest 
> that we go ahead without it, and leave the dc2.7 as the standard release.
>
> Would work on it more, but power is going down in a few minutes for 
> our building.
>
> -Richard J.

-- 
Mark M. Ito, Jefferson Lab, marki at jlab.org, (757)269-5295