[Halld-offline] Offline Software Meeting Minutes, September 30, 2015
Mark Ito
marki at jlab.org
Fri Oct 2 14:34:16 EDT 2015
Folks,
Find the minutes below and at
https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GlueX_Offline_Meeting,_September_30,_2015#Minutes
.
-- Mark
_______________________
GlueX Offline Meeting, September 30, 2015, Minutes
Present:
* *CMU*: Curtis Meyer, Mike Staib
* *FIU*: Mahmoud Kamel
* *JLab*: Amber Boehnlein, Mark Ito (chair), David Lawrence, Paul
Mattione, Kei Moriya, Eric Pooser, Nathan Sparks, Simon Taylor, Beni
Zihlmann
* *NU*: Sean Dobbs
* *UConn*: James McIntyre
There is arecording of this meeting <https://bluejeans.com/s/8Df9/>on
the BlueJeans site.
Announcements
1. *Team Maintainers and Admins*.Team Maintainers
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GitHub_and_GlueX>are
members of the"GlueX Team"
<https://github.com/orgs/JeffersonLab/teams/gluex>that are able to
add new members to the team on GitHub. Admins are members of
the"GlueX Admin"
<https://github.com/orgs/JeffersonLab/teams/gluex-admin>team and
have privilege to create and delete repositories owned by the GlueX
Team.
* Currently GlueX Team members are not allowed to create
repositories owned by team. There is a setting to allow that
privilege. Mark asked whether we should turn that on. David
suggested that we keep things as they are; team members have
private accounts and can create and delete repositories at will
using those accounts. Mature private repositories can be forked
into the GlueX Team when they are ready by one of the admins. We
agreed with David; keep things as they are.
2. *Collaboration Meeting
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GlueX-Collaboration-Oct-2015>October
8-10, 2015 at Jefferson Lab*. We reviewed the agenda as posted. Paul
may need more time than listed, but we decided not to do
micro-adjustments to the agenda.
Review of minutes from September 16
We went overthe minutes
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GlueX_Offline_Meeting,_September_16,_2015#Minutes>.
* *New Work Disk*. The initial rsync of our work disk to the new
Lustre server completed last week. It only took about 4 days. The
switch-over will require a down period for the final "top-off" rsync
of several hours. We will postpone that until after the
collaboration meeting.
* Sean has confirmed that*mailman.jlab.org is now accessible*from
off-site.
Offline Monitoring
Kei gave the report. Seehis slides
<https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/images/e/e5/2015-09-30-offline_monitoring.pdf>for
details. Topics covered included:
* Current launch (number of jobs, nature of failures)
* Statistics on the launch (memory use, CPU time vs. wall time, etc.)
* Farm environment (other jobs running in competition with the launch)
* Memory Usage on Farm (number of jobs memory limited, not limited by
number of job slots)
o Hall D can be memory efficient due to JANA multi-threading
o Other, non-Hall-D jobs may not be as memory efficient
o We may be tape limited in any case. (Paul)
o If an entire node is reserved for Hall D, then our memory
efficiency will translate into greater core usage efficiency.
(David)
* Moving Forward.
o Due to new plugins, now require 8GB of RAM to run jobs - some
pruning of unnecessary histograms would be welcome
o Request by Mike S. that only certain runs be run with
-PBCAL:USE_TDC=1, unfortunately bug in script made all runs
processed with this option
+ a negative effect on uncalibrated runs
o Started on BCAL cosmics 2015-06 ver03 on September 29 (Tue)
o Next launch is this week, October 2(Fri): no demand for this
o Any need for running over 2014-10 Data?: no requests received
SWIF Summary Output
Kei showed us anew webpage
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/data_monitoring/launch_analysis/tmp/summary_swif_output_offline_monitoring_RunPeriod2015_03_ver15_hd_rawdata.html>that
can be automatically generated to display statistics about each launch.
Some of the plots are among those he has been showing in the launch
reports, some are new. There is also a listing of all problem jobs.
Spring 2015 Commissioning Simulations
Mark reported that the re-do of theSpring 2015 Commissioning Simulations
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Spring_2015_Commissioning_Simulations>with
new BCAL code is about 80% done. Output files can be found at
/volatile/halld/detcom_02_1.
2016 Commissioning Simulations
Sean has started putting together awiki page
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Sim1_Conditions>with
information about standard conditions to be simulated next.
* Names for projects: something like sim1, sim2,...
* The data sets will not be necessarily tied to a particular real data
run, rather they will be generic and can be used for studies under
those generic conditions, for example signal studies for particular
reactions or rate studies.
* We may need a larger data set than those we have been generating for
commissioning simulations recently, perhaps something on the scale
of past data challenges. Right now the only large data set we have
is from Data Challenge 2, and that is getting kind of old now.
Auto-Build on Pull Request
Sean described the recent effort to set up a build of sim-recon
triggered by a pull request on GitHub as we discussed at the last meeting.
* He, Nathan, and Mark met with Marty Wise and he has installed some
packages on halldweb to support the system.
* The system uses the "gluex" user on GitHub.
* Mark put together the scripts to do the build. Although initiated on
halldweb, the build is executed on the ifarm.
* The CGI script on halldweb not only initiates the build but reports
the results back to GitHub as a comment on the originating pull request.
* There seems to be an issue having the entire process succeed from
GitHub's point of view, possibly because the build takes a while and
the system may be timing out. The build itself seems to succeed.
* The system is not active yet, but will be turned on once this last
issue is solved.
Noise Studies
Sean showed some initial results from a study comparing raw hit
distributions between simulated E&M background data and pair
spectrometer triggers. Seehis slides
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/b/b9/Sdobbs_OfflineMtg_20150930.pdf>for
all of the plots. There are a number of large discrepancies, but at this
stage there were a lot of questions about whether the comparisons were
fair. It does appear that the pair spectrometer triggers have a large
prompt component. If that conclusion holds up, then those data would not
be useful for these comparisons. If a random trigger could be set up,
that would solve the problem.
Mark remarked that it would be very nice if we could understand the
comparison. In particular, it would give us confidence in extrapolations
to higher beam rates using simulated data.
b1pi results review
We decided to postpone discussing theautomatic b1pi test
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Automatic_Tests_of_GlueX_Software>.
Review of recent pull requests
We also deferred this item. The idea was to review as a group thelist of
pull requests
<https://github.com/JeffersonLab/sim-recon/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr>initiated
since the last meeting.
Other Related Git Issues
Another set of topics that were postponed:
* policy on comments when merging
* alternate workflows for submitting pull requests
* using git rebase, should we?
Retrieved from
"https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=GlueX_Offline_Meeting,_September_30,_2015&oldid=70543"
* This page was last modified on 2 October 2015, at 14:31.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20151002/94b56df3/attachment.html>
More information about the Halld-offline
mailing list