[Halld-offline] priority groups for Hall D share of the batch farm

[Sean Dobbs]

Hi Alex,

I can understand having monitoring at a higher priority, but probably the
production jobs shouldn't be higher priority than calibration jobs, since
the monitoring/calibration of incoming data is the most time-sensitive part
of the chain.

Cheers,
Sean

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:30 PM Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org>
wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> The gxproj1 account is doing the first offline monitoring run. I would
> not give it a lower priority then gxproj5, in case we run a full
> production on 5 and take data at the same time. Maybe put them in the
> same group?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex
>
>
> On 02/08/2017 02:19 PM, Mark Ito wrote:
> > We would like three priority groups with priority weighting as follows:
> >
> > 1. highpriority 50%
> > 2. production  33%
> > 3. users         17%
> >
> > Membership:
> > 1. gxproj5, nsparks
> > 2. gxproj1, gxproj2, gxproj3, gxproj4, gxproj6
> > 3. all other halld users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.jlab.org_mailman_listinfo_halld-2Doffline&d=CwICAg&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=y4ZD58I4nPR6tZqjerSGt-WlWVAhqa3FHDMXqQ_5aUc&m=8HhWvZTKentvj4HluU5A_YHWAfJgIQi_d48v6-BKI5Y&s=3JYEkYIVVKILzBKtn49zuOAZd4O8QSRFO8gnT08iml8&e=
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20170208/3bfe327e/attachment-0002.html>