[Halld-offline] whenever the time comes
Nathan Sparks
nsparks at jlab.org
Thu Jul 6 19:32:49 EDT 2017
Hi Richard,
My build using ROOT 6.10.02 also failed (on CentOS 6, did not test others), but due to a missing header file.
I did successfully build the new JANA/sim-recon against ROOT 6.08.06.
-Nathan
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 7:24 PM, Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu> wrote:
>
> Mark
>
> My hdpm build command fails on version_2.13.xml with a compiler error of jana against this version of root, rolling back to root 6.08.00 and trying again.
>
> ompiling [src/plugins/janadot/JEventProcessorJANADOT.cc]
> Linking [src/.Linux_CentOS7-x86_64-gcc4.8.5/plugins/jana_iotest/jana_iotest.so]
> Installing [Linux_CentOS7-x86_64-gcc4.8.5/plugins/jana_iotest.so]
> Compiling [src/plugins/janarate/JEventProcessorJANARATE.cc]
> Compiling [src/plugins/janaroot/JEventProcessor_janaroot.cc]
> ROOTCLING [src/plugins/janaview/jv_mainframe.h]
> /usr/local/root/6.10.02/bin/rootcling: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/root/6.10.02/bin/rootcling: undefined symbol: TROOT__GetExtraInterpreterArgs
> Compiling [src/plugins/janaview/JEventProcessor_janaview.cc]
> scons: *** [src/.Linux_CentOS7-x86_64-gcc4.8.5/plugins/janaview/jv_mainframe_Dict.cc] Error 127
> scons: building terminated because of errors.
> 2017/07/06 23:06:03 exit status 2
> Error encountered, operation halted!
>
> -Richard Jones
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Mark Ito <marki at jlab.org <mailto:marki at jlab.org>> wrote:
> I did tag a new sim-recon today and I think I got your changes. See https://github.com/JeffersonLab/sim-recon/compare/2.15.0...2.16.0 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_JeffersonLab_sim-2Drecon_compare_2.15.0...2.16.0&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=oyKV5joTkJsuRYv6hh48IMTw3i-IrYD-ZUAHHU0DdAY&m=a0WOSUEppDWer7YzORFwnw-CKTpxuhde_k9SltRu6xE&s=V91x7cb53FU9hsHtCG-2IQo5wmCtLztU7oIgFq3sqnU&e=> to check me on that. It is there in my message, an upgrade from 2.15.0 to 2.16.0.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Jones" <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu <mailto:richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>>
> To: "Mark Ito" <marki at jlab.org <mailto:marki at jlab.org>>
> Cc: "halld-offline" <halld-offline at jlab.org <mailto:halld-offline at jlab.org>>
> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 4:32:16 PM
> Subject: Re: whenever the time comes
>
> Mark,
>
> To capture the updates to hdgeant, would it make sense to tag a new
> sim-recon as well? The updates I was referring to just got pulled into
> Master today.
>
> -Richard J.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Mark Ito <marki at jlab.org <mailto:marki at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > This is what I am contemplating: old versions are in version_2.12.xml, new
> > version are in version_2.13.xml:
> >
> > diff version_2.12.xml version_2.13.xml
> >
> >
> > < <package name="sim-recon" version="2.15.0"/>
> > ---
> > > <package name="sim-recon" version="2.16.0"/>
> >
> >
> > < <package name="root" version="6.08.00"/>
> > < <package name="ccdb" version="1.06.03"/>
> > ---
> > > <package name="root" version="6.10.02"/>
> > > <package name="ccdb" version="1.06.04"/>
> >
> >
> > < <package name="hdgeant4" version="1.2.0"/>
> > ---
> > > <package name="hdgeant4" version="1.3.0"/>
> >
> >
> > < <package name="gluex_root_analysis" version="0.1"/>
> > ---
> > > <package name="gluex_root_analysis" version="0.2"/>
> >
> > All of the new tags are from yesterday or today with the exception of
> > ROOT. I know of no reason not to update ROOT, but if others do, please let
> > me know.
> >
> > The only thing that is actually built right now is the new CCDB from
> > yesterday.
> >
> > -- Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/06/2017 03:56 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Mark,
> >>
> >> I submitted some bug fixes today to both hdgeant and hdgeant4. You
> >> captured the fixes to hdgeant4 in your new tag from a minute ago. As soon
> >> as you have captured the hdgeant fixes, can you create a new version.xml
> >> for the updates? Taken together, these updates fix some bugs that were
> >> present in the way beam bg was being generated in hdgeant and hdgeant4
> >> (different bugs, but neither one was accurate). David pointed this out when
> >> he saw that bg was taking a lot of time to generate using either sim, esp.
> >> hdgeant4. Any osg production testing we do should be done with these
> >> updates included. It should also include the recent improvements to jana
> >> and ccdb. As soon as you have a version.xml that captures all of that, let
> >> me know and I will update the images on cvmfs.
> >>
> >> -Richard Jones
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Mark Ito, marki at jlab.org <mailto:marki at jlab.org>, (757)269-5295 <tel:%28757%29269-5295>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20170706/d4848f71/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Halld-offline
mailing list