[Halld-offline] New tag for halld_sim, 3.0.1, recon directories now deleted [Re: Fwd: Re: Splitting sim-recon: push your changes by 5 pm today (Mon. July 30)]

[Mark Ito]

Folks,

Pushed some changes to delete the unwanted recon files from halld_sim. A 
new tag has been applied, 3.0.1, for halld_sim. This tag has been built 
and a new version set defined to use it: version_3.1_jlab.xml 
<https://halldweb.jlab.org/dist/version_3.1_jlab.xml>. This version set 
is now the default.

   -- Mark


On 07/31/2018 08:49 AM, Mark Ito wrote:
>
> And BTW, these particular defects should not render the split system 
> unusable. As I understand them now, they are examples of poor 
> housekeeping.
>
>
> On 07/31/2018 08:46 AM, Mark Ito wrote:
>>
>> Neglected to cc my response to Justin to the group...
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: [Halld-offline] Splitting sim-recon: push your changes 
>> by 5 pm today (Mon. July 30) [Re: push deadline postponed; new 
>> deadline to be discussed]
>> Date: 	Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:34:35 -0400
>> From: 	Mark Ito <marki at jlab.org>
>> To: 	Justin Stevens <jrsteven at jlab.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Justin,
>>
>> On 07/31/2018 07:45 AM, Justin Stevens wrote:
>> >
>> > -The sim components have been removed from halld_recon, but halld_sim 
>> > seems to still have all the source code from halld_recon.  It seems 
>> > these recon libraries are not built in halld_sim, but you plan to 
>> > remove this duplicated code, right?
>> Yes that code should be deleted and I see that it is not. I know I
>> worked on that when we changed the scheme to preserve branches on the
>> sim side. I'll have to look to see what happened.
>> > -David’s recent changes to SBMS seem to have been backed out bythe 
>> > initial commits to both halld_recon and halld_sim.  I assume that was 
>> > by accident?
>> I have not looked yet, but there were versions of both of the two new
>> SBMS areas waiting in storage to be swapped in at split time. That had
>> the risk that as time went on they could go stale. That might be what
>> happened. That is why I commented that we should not merge that branch
>> until after the split, it was a worry. But again, I haven't looked.
>>
>> Thanks for the comments; very helpful!
>>
>>    -- Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-offline mailing list
>> Halld-offline at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline
>
> -- 
> Mark Ito,marki at jlab.org, (757)269-5295
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline

-- 
Mark Ito, marki at jlab.org, (757)269-5295

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20180731/21bfe13c/attachment-0002.html>