[Halld-offline] [EXTERNAL] Re: NVM Fwd: G4 10.6

[Naomi Jarvis]

All of my test jobs ran to completion, which is great.

Before merging the PR, I thought I should also run a few tracking plugins,
just to check for nothing crazy and obvious.  That job is still running.

Naomi.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:27 PM Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
wrote:

> PS. I was not able to apply or test my fixes to the GeomNav0003 exception
> using version G4.10.06.p01 because in release 10.06 they have completely
> rewritten the part of the code that I patched. So either they recognised
> and fixed the problem (perhaps) or (more likely) scrambled things and moved
> the problem around. In any case, I have to start from scratch on debugging
> this issue on release 10.6, if it is still there. For the moment, let's
> just focus on testing if the fix works for G4.10.04.p02 and prior. Do you
> have a conclusion on that?
>
> -Richard Jones
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:02 PM Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu> wrote:
>
>> *Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*
>>
>> I realised that I should have downloaded 4.10.6.p01   as that's the one
>> that we have the fixes for.
>>
>> Mark I reminded me that I will need gcc beyond 4.8.5.   I used to have
>> 4.9.2 but I think it got wiped when the os went to redhat7.
>>
>> So I'm not sure what I'll do with this now.  Probably nothing for the
>> time being.
>>
>> I'm still shocked that the compilation failed, that doesn't look like a
>> compiler-version fault, not to my uneducated eyes anyway.
>>
>> Naomi.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu>
>> Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:49 PM
>> Subject: G4 10.6
>> To: Richard Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
>>
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Was it Geant4.10.6.p02 that you suggested that we try next?
>>
>> I thought I'd install it to check out the spiralling track
>> chordlength fix, but the build fails part-way through.   This is a bit
>> shocking.
>>
>> The version that I downloaded was  wget
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cern.ch_geant4-2Ddata_releases_geant4.10.06.p02.tar.gz&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Te_hCR4EUlJ6iCDYLJ8Viv2aDOR7D9ZZMoBAvf2H0M4&m=_g7eGe8Zno1dkGVTjo32R4mtRk9oVhFNlRhFeR5Oqfs&s=gandPLvV_PdnwEx_ZQhRyTUHSbcm5mM4rVBhY9witAg&e= 
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Fcern.ch-252Fgeant4-2Ddata-252Freleases-252Fgeant4.10.06.p02.tar.gz-26data-3D02-257C01-257Crichard.t.jones-2540uconn.edu-257C74c0fab652aa470b021a08d82429e16a-257C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080-257C0-257C0-257C637299109581369862-26sdata-3DGRQuRtkjCqbDdFVQLShV8d9eXiRZIQiYfX8J9obTq5Y-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Te_hCR4EUlJ6iCDYLJ8Viv2aDOR7D9ZZMoBAvf2H0M4&m=_g7eGe8Zno1dkGVTjo32R4mtRk9oVhFNlRhFeR5Oqfs&s=GE4NKwifw8oTUSebUYb82VhsiCfU4UGU3sZxJz0Tzco&e= >
>>
>> I thought that should already have had the patches applied, is that right?
>>
>> Did you run into anything like this?
>>
>> Naomi.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> */home/gluex/geant4/geant4.10.06.p02/source/geometry/magneticfield/src/G4FieldManagerStore.cc:*
>> In static member function ‘*static void
>> G4FieldManagerStore::DeRegister(G4FieldManager*)*’:
>>
>>
>> */home/gluex/geant4/geant4.10.06.p02/source/geometry/magneticfield/src/G4FieldManagerStore.cc:119:31:* *error:
>> *no matching function for call to ‘*G4FieldManagerStore::erase(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<G4FieldManager*
>> const*, std::vector<G4FieldManager*> >&)*’
>>
>>          GetInstance()->erase(i);
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20200709/ed9a5a71/attachment-0002.html>