<div dir="ltr">Matt,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Shepherd, Matthew <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mashephe@indiana.edu" target="_blank">mashephe@indiana.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
</span>Maybe this functionality is not needed if the flag<br>
above switches what the CCDB serves up. For<br>
that to work, the algorithm has to be the same<br>
for both data and MC at that stage in the reconstruction<br>
but just have different values of the CCDB constants.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Selecting the "mc" variation as Paul described will return tables of MC constants, assuming the MC-specific tables have been added. If not, the default tables will be returned (presumably with constant values appropriate for data). </div><div><br></div><div>There's not currently any way to automatically use different algorithms for data and MC, as far as I'm aware. In principle, one could check to see if the selected variation is "mc" or something else, and use that to select different algorithms, data tags, or something like that, but I'm not sure if that's something we want to allow.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Sean</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div></div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Sean Dobbs<br>Department of Physics & Astronomy <br>Northwestern University<br>phone: 847-467-2826</div></div>
</div></div>