<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>I've asked SciComp to return the priority settings back to where
      they were before yesterday.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/08/2017 02:44 PM, Mark Ito wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:8d14fc78-d833-e12e-0cc4-87c68e393b2f@jlab.org"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <p>This is temporary, maybe for a few days.</p>
      <p>The high priority tasks right now are polarization
        measurements, from the rho (gzproj5) and from the TPOL
        (nsparks). Everything else takes a back seat.<br>
      </p>
      After these two projects are done, things go back to the way they
      were before, i. e., highpriority disappears.<br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/08/2017 02:34 PM, Sean Dobbs
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CAEAoKm4JW_BAYgkhw0f9Cm5tO=4-H5p-3VaWfXP+Yj7a5rCv9w@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">Hi Alex,
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I can understand having monitoring at a higher priority,
            but probably the production jobs shouldn't be higher
            priority than calibration jobs, since the
            monitoring/calibration of incoming data is the most
            time-sensitive part of the chain.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Cheers,</div>
          <div>Sean</div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr">On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:30 PM Alexander
            Austregesilo <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:aaustreg@jlab.org">aaustreg@jlab.org</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Mark,<br
              class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            The gxproj1 account is doing the first offline monitoring
            run. I would<br class="gmail_msg">
            not give it a lower priority then gxproj5, in case we run a
            full<br class="gmail_msg">
            production on 5 and take data at the same time. Maybe put
            them in the<br class="gmail_msg">
            same group?<br class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            Cheers,<br class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            Alex<br class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            On 02/08/2017 02:19 PM, Mark Ito wrote:<br class="gmail_msg">
            > We would like three priority groups with priority
            weighting as follows:<br class="gmail_msg">
            ><br class="gmail_msg">
            > 1. highpriority 50%<br class="gmail_msg">
            > 2. production  33%<br class="gmail_msg">
            > 3. users         17%<br class="gmail_msg">
            ><br class="gmail_msg">
            > Membership:<br class="gmail_msg">
            > 1. gxproj5, nsparks<br class="gmail_msg">
            > 2. gxproj1, gxproj2, gxproj3, gxproj4, gxproj6<br
              class="gmail_msg">
            > 3. all other halld users<br class="gmail_msg">
            ><br class="gmail_msg">
            <br class="gmail_msg">
            _______________________________________________<br
              class="gmail_msg">
            Halld-offline mailing list<br class="gmail_msg">
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Halld-offline@jlab.org" class="gmail_msg"
              target="_blank">Halld-offline@jlab.org</a><br
              class="gmail_msg">
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.jlab.org_mailman_listinfo_halld-2Doffline&d=CwICAg&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=y4ZD58I4nPR6tZqjerSGt-WlWVAhqa3FHDMXqQ_5aUc&m=8HhWvZTKentvj4HluU5A_YHWAfJgIQi_d48v6-BKI5Y&s=3JYEkYIVVKILzBKtn49zuOAZd4O8QSRFO8gnT08iml8&e="
              rel="noreferrer" class="gmail_msg" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.jlab.org_mailman_listinfo_halld-2Doffline&d=CwICAg&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=y4ZD58I4nPR6tZqjerSGt-WlWVAhqa3FHDMXqQ_5aUc&m=8HhWvZTKentvj4HluU5A_YHWAfJgIQi_d48v6-BKI5Y&s=3JYEkYIVVKILzBKtn49zuOAZd4O8QSRFO8gnT08iml8&e=</a><br
              class="gmail_msg">
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marki@jlab.org">marki@jlab.org</a>, (757)269-5295
</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Halld-offline mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Halld-offline@jlab.org">Halld-offline@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marki@jlab.org">marki@jlab.org</a>, (757)269-5295
</pre>
  </body>
</html>