<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Folks,</p>
    <p>Please find the minutes <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/HDGeant4_Meeting,_June_29,_2021#Minutes">here</a>
      and below.</p>
    <p>  -- Mark</p>
    <p>     ___________________________________</p>
    <p>
    </p>
    <div id="globalWrapper">
      <div id="column-content">
        <div id="content" class="mw-body" role="main">
          <h2 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading" lang="en"><span dir="auto">HDGeant4 Meeting, June 29, 2021, </span><span class="mw-headline" id="Minutes">Minutes</span></h2>
          <div id="bodyContent" class="mw-body-content">
            <div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr" lang="en">
              <p>Present: Alex Austregesilo, Tegan Beattie, Sean Dobbs,
                Mark Ito (chair), Richard Jones, Zisis Papandreou, Simon
                Taylor, Jon Zarling, Beni Zihlmann
              </p>
              <p>There is a <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://bluejeans.com/s/Rho3x4PNH1b/">recording
                  of this meeting</a> on the BlueJeans site. Log into
                the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://jlab.bluejeans.com">BlueJeans site</a>
                first to gain access (use your JLab credentials).
              </p>
              <h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Review_of_minutes_from_the_last_meeting">Review of
                  minutes from the last meeting</span></h3>
              <p>We went over the <a href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/HDGeant4_Meeting,_June_15,_2021#Minutes" title="HDGeant4 Meeting, June 15, 2021">minutes from
                  the meeting on June 15</a>.
              </p>
              <p>We discussed what combination of versions we should aim
                at for the next major upgrade. We settled on the
                following:
              </p>
              <ul>
                <li> GCC 8.x</li>
                <li> ROOT 6.24.x</li>
                <li> Geant4 10.06.x</li>
              </ul>
              <p>The recommended Linux distribution is CentOS 7 with <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-8/">Developer
                  Toolset 8</a> (to provide GCC 8). A Singularity
                container with this combination has been built.
              </p>
              <h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Charged_hadron_timing_in_the_BCAL">Charged hadron
                  timing in the BCAL</span></h3>
              <p>Tegan showed his start at looking at charged hadrons in
                the reaction γp→π<sup>−</sup>Δ<sup>++</sup>. He has been
                working with Jon to set up the apparatus up to compare
                simulation with real data. He showed some preliminary
                plots that show good agreement. Notably he sees some
                double peaks in timing for data, probably due to
                proton/pion mis-identification, and those same peaks
                seem to be there in the simulation as well. See his
                plots in the recording.
              </p>
              <p>Tegan observed that with the good agreement he is
                seeing between simulation and data in single particle
                studies it becomes even more interesting to revisit the
                original studies of event efficiency that started us on
                this path.
              </p>
              <h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Comparison_of_Models_of_Polarized_Bethe-Heitler_Production">Comparison
                  of Models of Polarized Bethe-Heitler Production</span></h3>
              <p>Richard showed recent work comparing simulated
                Bethe-Heitler events between his Diracxx package and a
                generator built into a recent version of Geant4. He has
                reason to believe that the "Butler" model in G4 is close
                to that used by Andrew Schick in his simulations, which
                Andrew got from Rory Miskimen. The Butler model ignores
                the nuclear form factor, whereas it is taken into
                account in the Diracxx-based program. Richard sees the
                expected suppression of the cross section due to the
                form factor at high pair mass, where GlueX has
                acceptance, by a factor of a few compared to Butler. He
                sees agreement in the analyzing power predicted by the
                two models. He plans on giving a more comprehensive
                description of this work at the next Beamline Working
                Group meeting.
              </p>
              <h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Action_Items">Action
                  Items</span></h3>
              <ol>
                <li> Re-do comparisons of overall event reconstruction
                  efficiencies.</li>
                <li> Think about how to study the Schick-Smith-Dalton
                  effect(s). (all)</li>
                <li> Think about a GlueX Doc on simulation. (all)</li>
                <li> Think further about how to get to modern versions
                  of external software packages. (all)</li>
              </ol>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>