[Halld-physics] Ashot, Re: Primakov eta hadronic background
Ashot Gasparian
gasparan at jlab.org
Tue Dec 1 21:54:19 EST 2009
Dear Sascha,
This is a great progress on the way of background
simulations for the eta-Primakoff proposal.
It certainly shows that with the multi-function and
~4pi GlueX setup one can effectively separate an
elastic channel at the end of the spectrum, at list.
I will take a more careful look on your plots, but from
the first look they are already very promising. I agree
that we need more statistics for this background
estimation.
I will also double check the cross sections you are using
for the Primakoff part and contact to you soon.
In regard to n,eta,pi+ channel: can we use the information
from the forward time-of-flight detectors and effectively
suppress this background? There should be an easier ways
for the charged channels.
Thank you for your efforts and contributions to this project.
Ashot
.............................................................
Ashot Gasparian Phone:(336)285-2112 (NC A&T)
Professor of Physics
Physics Department (757)-269-7914 JLab
NC A&T State University Fax:(757)-269-6273 JLab
Greensboro, NC 27411 email: gasparan at jlab.org
.............................................................
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Alexander Somov wrote:
> Hello Ashot,
>
> Finally, I took a quick look on the hadronic bg for Primakov
> eta. I considered bg from inclusive eta photoproduction
> predicted by Pythia ( The inclusive eta background should
> dominate combinatorial bg)
>
>
> I put a few plots to
>
> http://www.jlab.org/~somov/primex
>
>
>
>
> ---MC sample----
>
> The MC sample corresponds to 2 10^7 Pythia events generated
> in the beam energy range of 9 GeV < E_gamma < 12 GeV
> (I selected events containing at least one eta in the final
> state with an angle < 1.6 deg, and processed these events
> through Geant). The magnetic field was switched OFF.
>
>
> This sample corresponds to about 32 reconstructed 'Primakov'
> eta's in the eta->2gamma decay channel.
>
> N_prim_eta(0 - 0.5 deg)_produced = 2e7 * 7.2e-4 / 122 = 118
> N_prim_eta_rec = 118 * 0.71 * 0.39 ~ 32,
>
> where 7.2 ub - is the Primakov production Xsection p(0. - 0.5 deg)
> 122 ub - is the total photoproduction Xsection
> 0.39 - is the branching fraction for eta -> 2 gamma
> 0.71 - is the prim eta acceptance (according to Aram).
>
>
> --Eta reconstruction--
>
> - considered events with only 2 clusters in the FCAL
> - eta p elastic decays were excluded from the sample
> - Primakov signal region was defined as:
> E_beam - E_2gamma > -0.4 GeV
> (more than 3 sigma region according to the eta mass constrained fit).
> Angle(gamma gamma) < 0.5 deg.
>
>
> Below are descriptions to plots
> -------------------------------
>
> angle_vs_energy.pdf
> -------------------
>
> Reconstructed angle of 2 photons versus ( E_beam - E_2gamma )
>
> top right plot: veto events with the bcal total energy (summed
> over all reconstructed photons) larger than
> 60 MeV. This cut removes most background from
> p eta pi0 decays. Remaining bg originates mainly from
> n eta pi+
>
> Note: 99% of the p eta (eta->gamma gamma) elastic decays survive this
> cut.
>
>
> bottom left plot: Exclude events where the reconstructed eta and
> a track candidate having a hit(s) in the SC are
> positioned NOT back-to-back in phi, i.e.,
> delta_phi < 170 deg or delta_phi > 190, where
> delta_phi = Phi(2gamma) - Phi(HIT_SC).
> ( If there are no hits in the SC, we keep this
> event ).
>
> The delta_phi distribution for the reconstructed
> p eta decays is shown in the file eta_dphi.ps.
> -----------
> The remaining event close to the signal region is
> p eta pi+; I need large statistics to study it in
> detail. We can presumably measure p eta pi+ decays
> and subtract them from the 'Primakov' signal
> region.
>
>
> All in all, I don't see large background in the Primakov signal region
> (If here is no bug in my code, of course ). I hope that you know the ABC
> store close to the lab... :)
>
> We can discuss more details during the meeting. I will need to check evrth.
> and generate a large sample...
>
>
> Cheers,
> Sascha
>
>
More information about the Halld-physics
mailing list