[Halld-physics] Comparisons to CLAS cross sections

[Curtis Meyer]

Dear Colleagues,

  during the cross-section meeting today, there were a number of comparisons to CLAS data that were shown. I think it is important to note that most CLAS analyses were generally  independent of each other, so finding different relative normalizations to different CLAS analysis should not be unexpected. There is a consistent set of analyses on eta/eta-prime (Williams 2009), omega (Williams 2009), K+ Lambda (McCracken 2010?), K Sigma (Dey 2013?) and phi (Dey 2014) that were done consistently, so comparisons to these data sets should agree on normalizations.

Curtis
---------
Curtis A. Meyer MCS Associate Dean for Research
Phone:    (412) 268-2745 Professor of Physics
Cell:        (412) 260-6290 Carnegie Mellon University
Fax:         (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh, PA 15213
cmeyer at cmu.edu<mailto:cmeyer at cmu.edu> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.curtismeyer.com_&d=DwIFAg&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=p3b5acpwYNkmZ3alLqoe1DpcHi6vq5JvK_7ohJe1WqI&m=E0xE1cCBNYX0kC8QG7zkAmQKygYb66jGFKpTYkkS5Mw&s=SdzWij6szLoxl48VRZn3rMLW_-negPBGI08MvcrkVGg&e= 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-physics/attachments/20190628/45015f0d/attachment.html>