[Halld-pid] TOF resolution
Elton Smith
elton at jlab.org
Mon Feb 7 11:16:42 EST 2011
Hi Paul and Alexander,
I was thinking about the discussion at the collaboration meeting of
increasing the width of the scintillators to accommodate the magnetic
shielding. Given that the resolutions that have been achieved are on the
order of 120 ps and our goal is 80 ps, I think we should actually be
considering reducing the width to increase the number of photoelectrons
collected. From the the light guide design that is proposed, any
increase of the scintillator width beyond about 5 cm will start loosing
light (and in fact also become less uniform in collection). So you might
want to think carefully about the alternative of having a staggered
configuration with sufficient overlap to avoid inefficiencies. This will
increase the number of channels somewhat, but also reduce the rate per
paddle, especially near the beam hole, where Sasha indicates the rates
are perhaps too high already. He was suggesting reducing the width by a
factor of 2 here, but I don't recall the numbers.
Cheers, Elton.
Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H5
12000 Jefferson Ave
Suite #16
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7625
(757) 269-6331 fax
More information about the Halld-pid
mailing list