<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Folks,<br>
    <br>
    Find the minutes below and at<br>
    <br>
     
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GlueX_TOF_Meeting,_March_18,_2015#Minutes">https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GlueX_TOF_Meeting,_March_18,_2015#Minutes</a><br>
    <br>
      -- Mark<br>
    ___________________________________<br>
    <br>
    <div id="globalWrapper">
      <div id="column-content">
        <div id="content" class="mw-body" role="main"> <br>
          <span dir="auto">GlueX TOF Meeting, March 18, 2015</span><span
            class="mw-headline" id="Minutes">, Minutes</span><br>
          <div id="bodyContent" class="mw-body-content">
            <div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
              lang="en">
              <br>
              Present:
              <br>
              <ul>
                <li> <b>FSU</b>: Paul Eugenio</li>
                <li> <b>JLab</b>: Mark Ito (chair), Sasha Ostrovidov,
                  Beni Zihlmann</li>
                <li> <b>NU</b>: Sean Dobbs</li>
              </ul>
              <br>
              <span class="mw-headline" id="Calibration_Status">Calibration
                Status</span><br>
              <br>
              Sasha showed <a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
                href="http://hadron.physics.fsu.edu/%7Eostrov/tof/20150317/">plots</a>
              illustrating one of the difficulties he is having with the
              outer counters of the detector. For front-back
              coincidences, he shows x determined by the known location
              of the counter in the back plane vs x determined by time
              difference in the front plane. For module 19 in the front,
              near the middle of the array, the correlation is clear and
              time difference easy to calibrate. For module 0 at the
              edge the statistics are much less and there are a lot more
              uncorrelated hits.
              <br>
              Sasha is still formulating a plan for calibration of the
              short paddles. Since they are in the middle of the array,
              their occupancy is high and calibrating them is important.
              <br>
              <br>
              <span class="mw-headline"
                id="TOF_Reconstruction_Performance">TOF Reconstruction
                Performance</span><br>
              <br>
              Sean showed some <a
href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/4/4b/TOF_Meeting_2015-03-17.pdf"
                class="internal" title="TOF Meeting 2015-03-17.pdf">plots</a>
              showing widely varying charged-track matching efficiency
              with charged tracks for two nearby runs from the Fall run.
              Even for the "good" run the match efficiency is not so
              great. For the "bad" run, there are very few good TOF hits
              from the hit factory to begin with. Beni thought that this
              might be due to the entire time frame shifting between
              runs due to trigger changes. If so it emphasizes the
              importance of keeping track of trigger changes, especially
              where the timing is affected.
              <br>
            </div>
            <div class="printfooter">
              <br>
              Retrieved from "<a dir="ltr"
href="https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=GlueX_TOF_Meeting,_March_18,_2015&oldid=64258">https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=GlueX_TOF_Meeting,_March_18,_2015&oldid=64258</a>"</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <br>
    -- Mark M. Ito, Jefferson Lab, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marki@jlab.org">marki@jlab.org</a>, (757)269-5295
  </body>
</html>