[Halld-tagger] active collimator signal vs translation stage displacement
Richard Jones
richard.t.jones at uconn.edu
Thu Nov 3 09:01:09 EDT 2011
Hovanes,
Ok, I agree. I will subtract the dc bias from both signals, and measure the dI/dx independently for each wedge to fix the gains, and post the corrected results shortly.
-Richard Jones
On 11/3/2011 8:15 AM, Hovanes Egiyan wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I like this plot is better, and I understand how the errors were calculated.
> I think until the offsets and the slopes for both sides are calibrated the
> asymmetry is beam current dependent (in addition to beam position) and
> the peaks in the spectra you showed cannot be interpreted as purely beam
> motion, but they can be due to beam current fluctuations.
>
> Hovanes.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-tagger/attachments/20111103/9902160d/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2757 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-tagger/attachments/20111103/9902160d/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Halld-tagger
mailing list