[Halld-tagger] Hall D Cable Assignment
Alexander Somov
somov at jlab.org
Thu Jun 21 09:41:09 EDT 2012
Hi Fernando,
Here are cabling schemes for the PS, the microscope,
and the fixed-array counters. I would not put fadc
channel on labels. If some fadc channels are dead, the
cabling is screwed up. I assume that labels are the same
on both cable ends; we don't have many channels in
these detectors.
Cheers,
Alex
P.S. Richard, Franz, please take a look on the microscope
and fixed array labling
Pair Spectrometer
-----------------
DET - SIDE - FADC/TDC - CH
1. Fine Granularity (128 + 128 = 256 channels)
PS1 - 1 - A - 1
..............
PS1 - 1 - A - 256
PS1 - 2 - A - 1
..............
PS1 - 2 - A - 256
2. Low granularity ( 8 + 8 = 16 channels)
PS2 - 1 - A - 1
...............
PS2 - 1 - A - 8
PS2 - 1 - T - 1
...............
PS2 - 1 - T - 8
PS2 - 2 - A - 1
...............
PS2 - 2 - A - 8
PS2 - 2 - T - 1
...............
PS2 - 2 - T - 8
Fixed Array (190 channels)
--------------------------
DET - FADC/TDC - CH
FA - A - 1
............
FA - A - 190
FA - T - 1
............
FA - T - 190
Microscope (120 + 2 = 122 ch)
-----------------------------
DET - FADC/TDC - CH
MIC - A - 1
...........
MIC - A - 122
MIC - T - 1
...........
MIC - T - 122
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Fernando J Barbosa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The status is as follows:
>
> Tagger - NO RESPONSE
> PS - NO RESPONSE
> ST - review in progress
> CDC - partial
> FDC - NO RESPONSE
> TOF - review in progress
> BCAL - Submitted - review in progress
> FCAL - Submitted - review in progress.
> other sub-systems - NO RESPONSE
>
> This is just a reminder that the deadline for submission of Excel files is on
> 6/22/2012.
>
> Best regards,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/31/2012 3:29 PM, Fernando J Barbosa wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have just updated the documentation on the portal. Refer to
>> GlueX-doc-1452, 2018 and 2019.
>>
>> This is the current status on cable assignments:
>>
>> Tagger - NO RESPONSE
>> PS - NO RESPONSE
>> ST - partial
>> CDC - NO RESPONSE
>> FDC - NO RESPONSE
>> TOF - partial
>> BCAL - partial
>> FCAL - partial.
>> other sub-systems - NO RESPONSE
>>
>> The previous deadline of 4/27/2012 was not adhered to. Please be advised
>> that there is a risk that the Hall D project will be delayed if you fail to
>> provide the requested information by 6/22/2012 as there are a number of
>> preparation tasks before the cables are installed.
>>
>> Please provide the requested information in an xlxs file.
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> Fernando
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/24/2012 4:16 PM, Fernando J Barbosa wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We need to finalize the cable assignment in preparation for cable
>>> bundling, testing and installation in Hall D. Specifically, I need to know
>>> from you, those responsible for sub-systems/detectors, which cables get
>>> connected to which detector elements and to which racks/crates/modules.
>>> Please also consider which cables need to be routed to favor trigger
>>> formation, if applicable. This information should be generally in the
>>> following form:
>>>
>>> Detector-Detector Element-Cable Label-Rack-Crate-Slot.
>>>
>>> In other cases, such as controls, there will be instances of cabling from
>>> a particular unit in a rack to another rack. In either case, please
>>> provide me with an xlsx file for each of your sub-systems.
>>>
>>> I have attached two pdfs: Cable Labeling contains the labeling norms we
>>> agreed to some time ago; Cable Labels contains the official labels that
>>> were sent to the cable vendor at the time of award. GlueX-doc-1452
>>> contains all the information on racks in the hall.
>>>
>>> I need to have this information by April 27 because cable preparation
>>> starts in May.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your attention and best regards,
>>> Fernando
>>
>
>
More information about the Halld-tagger
mailing list