[Halld-tagger] Tungsten tube in primary collimator

Alexandre Deur deurpam at jlab.org
Thu Jan 21 14:00:34 EST 2016


If we wrap the tube in aluminum tape, the gap will be 100 um everywhere and filled with aluminum. It might be an acceptable and faster solution than machining custom pieces? 

Alexandre

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Timothy Whitlatch" <whitey at jlab.org>
> To: "Curtis A. Meyer" <cmeyer at cmu.edu>
> Cc: "Hall D beam working group" <halld-tagger at jlab.org>, "Hovanes Egiyan" <hovanes at jlab.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 1:07:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Halld-tagger] Tungsten tube in primary collimator

> Yes, off the diameter. It would leave a 200um gap at top.
> 
> We can overcome this by making 2 custom pieces, so not a big deal.
> 
> 
> Tim Whitlatch
> Hall D Engineer
> Jefferson Lab
> 600 KELVIN DR STE 5
> Newport News, VA 23606-4468
> 757-269-5087
> 
> 
> From: "Curtis A. Meyer" <cmeyer at cmu.edu>
> To: "Richard Jones" <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
> Cc: "Timothy Whitlatch" <whitey at jlab.org>, "Hall-D Tagged Beam Group"
> <halld-tagger at jlab.org>, "Egiyan, Hovanes" <hovanes at jlab.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:25:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Halld-tagger] Tungsten tube in primary collimator
> 
> I think it comes of a diamater, not the length. That leaves a small “crack”
> along the top??
> -------
> Prof. Curtis A. Meyer Department of Physics
> Phone: (412) 268-2745 Carnegie Mellon University
> Fax: (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh, PA 15213
> curtis.meyer at cmu.edu http://www.curtismeyer.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Richard Jones < richard.t.jones at uconn.edu > wrote:
> 
> Tim,
> 
> I wasn't sure which dimension the 200 microns comes off of, but if it is the
> length (7.5cm) there is no need to fine-adjust that, 7.4 cm would work just as
> well.
> 
> -Richard J.
> 
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Timothy Whitlatch < whitey at jlab.org > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I can get 5mm diameter precision ground tungsten carbide rod (twice the density
> of steel) 7.5cm long.
> 
> This can be cut in half lengthwise and then the aperture cut in each half.
> 
> With the wire EDM machining process we will loose about 200um but can overcome
> this by making additional pieces and matching them together.
> 
> Tim Whitlatch
> Hall D Engineer
> Jefferson Lab
> 600 KELVIN DR STE 5
> Newport News, VA 23606-4468
> 757-269-5087
> 
> 
> From: "Richard Jones" < richard.t.jones at uconn.edu >
> To: "Timothy Whitlatch" < whitey at jlab.org >
> Cc: "Alexandre Deur" < deurpam at jlab.org >, "Eugene Chudakov" < gen at jlab.org >,
> "Hall-D Tagged Beam Group" < halld-tagger at jlab.org >
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 9:19:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Tungsten tube in primary collimator
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> Yesterday I promised to do a quick MC study to determine what a steel collimator
> insert with an aperture adjusted to allow the TAC to run safely with a 10 nA
> electron beam and a 2e-5 radlen radiator. The answers are given in a quick tech
> note that I link below. I am not done writing it yet, so if there are plots or
> results that you would like to see added please let me know. The bottom line is
> that steel will work just fine, and it only needs to be 15 cm long. The inner
> aperture diameter should be 1.1 mm. In response to Tim's question, tungsten
> would be better of course, but steel seems to work just fine and might be
> easier to work with.
> 
> http://zeus.phys.uconn.edu/halld/collim-1-2016/collim-1-2016.pdf
> 
> -Richard Jones
> 
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Timothy Whitlatch < whitey at jlab.org > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> In speaking with the machine shop, we can take a precision ground tungsten rod
> and cut it in half long wise with wire EDM.
> We can then cut a 1.5mm diameter half hole in each half.
> 
> Both halves would then be put in the 5mm primary collimator hole together giving
> us a 1.5mm hole (or what diameter is needed).
> 
> Tim Whitlatch
> Hall D Engineer
> Jefferson Lab
> 600 KELVIN DR STE 5
> Newport News, VA 23606-4468
> 757-269-5087
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-tagger mailing list
> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-tagger mailing list
> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger



More information about the Halld-tagger mailing list