[Halld-tagger] End user polarization

[Richard Jones]

Mike,

Would the value returned have discontinuities at the 100 MeV bin
boundaries, or be parameterized according to some peak/edge model? This is
particular important that the location of the edge, where the polarization
is very energy dependent and possibly run dependent because of that.

-Richard J.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, <dugger at jlab.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about event-by-event polarizations.
>
> While TPOL can not give an event-by-event polarization, we could provide
> some sort of subroutine that gives the average run polarization on an
> event-by-event basis. The subroutine would take as arguments the run
> number and photon energy for an event, with the return value being the
> polarization (based off a polarization binning of 100 MeV).
>
> Does this sound like the sort of thing that is desired?
>
> My plan is to go ahead with making the code that gives the polarization
> for a set of runs (provided by the end user), and then have our grad
> student (Sebastian Cole) create the final code that takes into account the
> feedback we get from our fellow GlueX collaborators.
>
> Take care,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-tagger mailing list
> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-tagger/attachments/20170605/89247389/attachment.html>