[Halld-tagger] End user polarization
dugger at jlab.org
dugger at jlab.org
Tue Jun 6 08:00:50 EDT 2017
Mark,
I'm less interested in how I will use the information than how others want
to use the information. Recently, we started talking about code that can
be implemented by the end user. I think that it makes sense to hear what
other people may want.
Take care,
Michael
> Mike,
>
> How do you imagine the info being used?
>
> -- Mark
>
>
> On 06/05/2017 03:37 PM, dugger at jlab.org wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> That is exactly the sort of thing we will have to look at.
>>
>> Take care,
>> Michael
>>
>>> Mike [trying again, with spelling fixed],
>>>
>>> Would the value returned have discontinuities at the 100 MeV bin
>>> boundaries, or be parameterized according to some peak/edge model? This
>>> is
>>> particularly important at the location of the edge, where the
>>> polarization
>>> is very energy dependent and possibly run dependent because of that.
>>>
>>> -Richard J.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Richard Jones
>>> <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike,
>>>>
>>>> Would the value returned have discontinuities at the 100 MeV bin
>>>> boundaries, or be parameterized according to some peak/edge model?
>>>> This
>>>> is
>>>> particular important that the location of the edge, where the
>>>> polarization
>>>> is very energy dependent and possibly run dependent because of that.
>>>>
>>>> -Richard J.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, <dugger at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking about event-by-event polarizations.
>>>>>
>>>>> While TPOL can not give an event-by-event polarization, we could
>>>>> provide
>>>>> some sort of subroutine that gives the average run polarization on an
>>>>> event-by-event basis. The subroutine would take as arguments the run
>>>>> number and photon energy for an event, with the return value being
>>>>> the
>>>>> polarization (based off a polarization binning of 100 MeV).
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this sound like the sort of thing that is desired?
>>>>>
>>>>> My plan is to go ahead with making the code that gives the
>>>>> polarization
>>>>> for a set of runs (provided by the end user), and then have our grad
>>>>> student (Sebastian Cole) create the final code that takes into
>>>>> account
>>>>> the
>>>>> feedback we get from our fellow GlueX collaborators.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Halld-tagger mailing list
>>>>> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-tagger mailing list
>> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-tagger mailing list
> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>
More information about the Halld-tagger
mailing list