[Halld-tagger] [EXTERNAL] notes from tagger working group meeting this morning

[zihlmann]

Hi All,

regarding scintillator alternatives (proposed by Malte, Arshak, ...) I 
am investigating several paths to obtain LYSO crystals
with 2mm by 2mm cross section and a length of 20mm or thereabouts. I 
think the length is not that important but the cross section
is to fit the current geometry. I contacted two companies in the US and 
waiting responses. There is a company in China where one
could buy online such crystals right away with a cost of 39$ per piece 
(excluding taxes and tarifs). So my hope is that we could
get our hands on some such crystals on a rather short time scale.

My basic idea is to equip the last "bundle" (most downstream), 3 columns 
with 5 scintillators each, with such crystals
(the coupling has not yet been evaluated) till February and run with 
that in the next run period. If that is possible we would learn
likely quite a lot about the usefulness of such crystals and hopefully a 
path forward to "upgrade" the full microscope.

cheers,
Beni

On 10/10/25 08:36, Justin Stevens via Halld-tagger wrote:
> Hi Richard, All,
>
> Thanks for the summary of yesterday’s discussion and sorry I had to 
> leave a bit early for the DNP practice talks.  While we continue to 
> investigate the exact reason for the loss of light yield, I suggest we 
> begin planning a test that can be performed in 2026 to evaluate the 
> options for potential replacement of the scintillating fibers before 
> GlueX-III.
>
> One possibility would be a small test setup on one of the PS arms with 
> candidates for the 2x2 mm scintillators that can be tested with real 
> signals from energy-tagged electrons.  We would need an equivalent 
> readout to the existing TAGM bundles, but most of the electronics 
> infrastructure: f250 and f1TDC boards, crates, LV, etc. should already 
> be available in that area for the PS/ST/TPOL readout.  So, I believe 
> we would need the TAGM preamp boards with SiPMs and light guide fibers 
> to couple to the candidate scintillators we want to evaluate.  Do we 
> have spares of those items that could be used for such a test starting 
> in early 2026?
>
> There is also the potentially more important question of what are the 
> options for replacement scintillators with the appropriate shape that 
> may be more radiation resistant and how can we test that radiation 
> hardness?  I understood from Malte that there may be some LYSO 
> crystals with an appropriate profile and Eljen 
> https://eljentechnology.com/products/fibers may have some appropriate 
> fibers, but we should consider procuring these and other options soon 
> if we aim to test them next year.
>
> More thoughts, suggestions, corrections are welcome.  I just think we 
> need to keep brainstorming on this to keep up the momentum towards 
> finding a solution for GlueX-III.
>
> -Justin
>
>> On Oct 9, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Richard T. Jones via Halld-tagger 
>> <halld-tagger at jlab.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> We had a special meeting this morning at 10:00 devoted to a review of 
>> everything we know regarding the degrading response of the tagger 
>> microscope over the last few run periods. A new logbook entry has 
>> been added containing a historical record of the photon yield and 
>> other calibration constants for the TAGM which presents clear 
>> evidence of significant loss of scintillation photon yields over the 
>> past 5 years, with most of the loss occurring in the rows that saw 
>> the greatest flux of electrons.
>>
>>   * gain and photon yield history of the tagger microscope
>>     <https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4459304>
>>
>> Ideas to further investigate the exact reasons for the decrease, as 
>> well as ideas for recovering and sustaining good performance during 
>> Phase 3 running are still in process, with follow-up to happen in the 
>> next Photon Beam working group mtg next week.
>>
>> -Richard Jones
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-tagger mailing list
>> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-tagger mailing list
> Halld-tagger at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-tagger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-tagger/attachments/20251010/301d32ea/attachment.htm>