[Halld-tracking-hw] CDC Drawings
Tim Whitlatch
whitey at jlab.org
Fri Aug 21 07:32:57 EDT 2009
10am it is. Rm 428 ARC at JLAB.
Tim
Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> 10:00am is good -- Curtis
> Tim Whitlatch wrote:
>> How about 10am?
>>
>> Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
>>> Hi Tim -
>>>
>>> can we set up a meeting tomorrow morning at 11:00am to go
>>> over all the drawings. We have a few questions that I will type in
>>> below, and then a number of questions on what certain holes are
>>> for that we can discuss.
>>>
>>> FeedThru/Donut:
>>>
>>> 1) The groove for the glue has been slightly modified. This
>>> looks to
>>> be a good design as it avoids the chance of breaking a
>>> drill bit. We
>>> are however worried that the sharp edge will catch on
>>> insertion. Can
>>> we put a champfer on the sharp edge on the grooves on the
>>> donuts
>>> and the inserts?
>>>
>>> 2) The vent hole on the donuts and inserts was increased in
>>> size to 0.035.
>>> We originally had it smaller to aid in construction so
>>> that it is obvious
>>> which hole the syringe goes into. They are a too close in
>>> size now to
>>> be able to do that. If it was increased for a
>>> manufacturing reason, then
>>> perhaps we should just make both holes the same size.
>>> Otherwise, we
>>> should shrink the vent back down.
>>>
>>>
>>> End Plates:
>>>
>>> 1) One endplate is still labeled as 6mm carbon fiber. This
>>> needs to be fixed.
>>>
>>> 2) There are several places where 12/24 screws are used. This
>>> is a very odd
>>> size and difficult to get parts for. This should be
>>> changed to a standard
>>> size.
>>>
>>> 3) The grooves that are used to hold the shells have widths of
>>> 0.050 and 0.100
>>> inches. Do you have a suggestion for what we should use in
>>> these. Basically,
>>> we want to discuss the size of these.
>>>
>>> 4) The upstream endplate has 1 mil tolerances on the survey
>>> ball holes and the
>>> support rods. The down stream has 2mil tolerances. Why the
>>> difference?
>>>
>>> 5) The holes to attach the bearing blocks seemed to us to be
>>> very odd sizes. Perhaps
>>> the match a known unit, but seeing them as drawn, they
>>> seemed odd. One is
>>> 15-thou over a 1/4 and the other is 0.188 inch.
>>>
>>> 6) It does not appear to us that there are marks on the
>>> endplates to indicate the
>>> first hole in each layer. There is a call-out to the
>>> manufacturer as to which they
>>> are, but it is not obvious that they are marked on the
>>> plates.
>>>
>>> 7) There is probably a good reason for this, but we noted that
>>> the holes for support
>>> standoffs and gas at the outer diameter are placed at
>>> four different radii. The
>>> numerical values for these seem to be random numbers. The
>>> question is can these
>>> be at round "english" numbers.
>>>
>>> 8) We are not sure what a number of the holes are, but the
>>> twelve 5/16" threaded holes
>>> at 23.15" radius confused us. What are they?
>>>
>>> Cheers -- Curtis,
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Halld-tracking-hw
mailing list