[Halld-tracking-hw] Carbn Fiber Parts
Curtis A. Meyer
cmeyer at ernest.phys.cmu.edu
Fri Jul 16 06:35:13 EDT 2010
Hi Everyone -
we have carefully gone through the plastic donuts and feedthrus. We
find that the
ODs of both the donuts and the feedthrus are slightly under their
specifications:
donuts 0.6 to 0.7 mil too small and the feedthru about 0.3 mil too small
(on average).
We are extremely uncomfortable with the run-out that this will lead to
when we assemble
the chamber. We believe that this can adversely affect the the location
of the wires at a
level larger than 5 mils. We are also concerned that the run-out may
exceed the spacing
that we allowed for between tubes, making installation of the last
element in a layer difficult.
Finally, the run-out makes us prone to gas leaks at the input end of the
tubes which worries
us in terms of guaranteeing good gas flow in the chamber.
I know that this introduces a delay, but we are very uncomfortable
with the parts in hand.
We feel that the following changes need to be made to reduce our
perceived risk with
the chamber assembly.
1) Increase the OD of the donut as it now stands by 1.0 to 1.5 mils.
2) Increase the OD of the feedthru as it now stands by 1.0 to 1.5 mils.
3) Increase the size of the pin-hole in the pin holder so the crimp pin fits
into the hole.
Curtis
-----Note on measurements-----
All measurements at CMU were performed with a brand new Mitutyo 293-344
digital micrometer that reads to five decimal places and is guaranteed
accurate
to 0.00005 inches (1 micron). The has a ratchet-friction thimble so
that you cannot
squeeze the component too tightly.
The ID of the straws which we received is difficult to accurately
measure. We have made
a part that slips in when we are cutting the straws that is 0.6106. From
this, and the nature
of the fit, we estimate that the ID of the tubes are about 0.611.
We also note that because all the holes in the carbon fiber endplate
were reamed using a
0.4375 tungston-carbide reamer, then checked with pin gauges, we believe
that all holes
are 0.4375, which is the lower end of the specification.
Each of the parts that we received were measured many times in diffrent
configurations.
Those numbers are reported here, the largest first, follwed by the
smallest. The largest
number was measured with the micrometer on the small ridge.
Donut OD: Design Specifications is 0.609 to 0.611
-- the average of all of our measurements is 0.60784
0.60880 0.60730
0.60880 0.60710
0.60875 0.60720
0.60870 0.60700
0.60875 0.60715
0.60860 0.60690
0.60850 0.60680
0.60850 0.60695
0.60860 0.60680
0.60850 0.60700
Donuts OD when mounted on the 0.4375" pin-go-gauge. The two measurements
were taken 90 degrees apart near the glue trough.
0.60880, 0.60835
0.60870, 0.60815
0.60870, 0.60845
0.60875, 0.60810
0.60890, 0.60860
0.60880, 0.60830
0.60860, 0.60830
Donut ID: Design Specification is 0.4375 to 0.4395
All were checked with our 0.4375 go-gauge, 0.4396 no-go-gauge and
passed.
We noted that a 0.4380 pin-gauge would go through the holes.
Feedthru OD Design Specifications are 0.4355 to 0.4375
-- the average of all our measurements is 0.43491
0.43595 0.42400
0.43570 0.43410
0.43570 0.43400
0.43570 0.43435
0.43570 0.43410
0.43565 0.43395
0.43550 0.43450
0.43560 0.43400
0.43555 0.43430
0.43565 0.43410
Feedthru OD when mounted on the 0.25000 pin-go-gauge. Measurements were
taken
90 degrees apart near the glue trough
0.43575, 0.43525
0.43570, 0.43525
0.43560, 0.43515
0.43580, 0.43520
0.43565, 0.43525
0.43570, 0.43520
0.43565, 0.43525
In all of the above cases, the typical smaller measurement will lead to
the biggest slop
in the fits. Also, if we take the measurements when mounted on the pin
gauges to be
the reference, then the donut OD is about 0.6-0.7mil under specification
and the feed-thru
is about 0.3 mil under specification. Essentially, with all the OD's
undersized, and the IDs
in the middle of the specifications, we have a build-up of loose tolerances.
1) Strawtube to donut is about 2.5 to 3.0 mil. This affects our ability
to guarantee a gas-tight
seal at the down stream end of the chamber as the gas enters the
straws.
2) The feedthru to the donut is about 3.0mil. This also affects our
ability to guarantee a
gas-tight fit at the down stream end of the chamber.
The two comments on gas above worry me. If we have leaks near the
input to the straws,
will we be able to guarantee good gas flow through the straws? A
may be paranoid, but
our performance is very sensitive to gas (as we have seen from our
recent work with
the preamplifiers).
3) The feedthru to the endplate is about 2.5mil. This most directly
impacts the centering of the
wire in the hole. This needs to be combined with the tolerances of
the pin-holder.
4) The OD of the pinholder to the ID of the Feedthru is snug because of
two small ridges
near the top of the pin holder. The fit at the base of the
pin-holder is very loose. I am
not certain if this is an issue or not, but mention it for
completeness.
The above 1-3 also impact where the straw will be located relative to
the center of the
hole in the end plate. We have a potential build up of
(2.5-3.0)+(3.0)+(2.5). The concern here
is that this will be a systematic that pushes the straws apart, so it
could consistently
be above 5 mils. I do not believe that this will impact the
electrostatics, but it could build
up going around a layer of straws, and impact our ability both our
ability to insert the last
straw in a layer as well as place the "close-packed" layers in place. I
believe that our design
allowed for a 5 mil gap between straws.
--
Prof. Curtis A. Meyer Department of Physics
Phone: (412) 268-2745 Carnegie Mellon University
Fax: (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer at ernest.phys.cmu.edu http://www.curtismeyer.com/
More information about the Halld-tracking-hw
mailing list