[Hps-analysis] New WABs

[Bradley T Yale]

It's no problem.

I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 vs. 0.0004375 cm).

________________________________
From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM
To: Bradley T Yale
Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
Subject: Re: New WABs

The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and b
factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look significantly
different.

Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's easy.
I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things clearer.

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:

> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':
>
>
> Pure WAB:
>
> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>
>
> WAB with background:
>
> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tritrigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>
>
> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.
>
> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.
>
>
> -Bradley
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160804/c34bfa53/attachment.html>