[Hps-analysis] New WABs

[Bradley T Yale]

Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.


NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):

/mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio


OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):

/mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio

Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.

Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC should be the only difference between them.


________________________________
From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM
To: Bradley T Yale
Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
Subject: Re: New WABs

Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:

> It's no problem.
>
> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 vs. 0.0004375 cm).
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM
> To: Bradley T Yale
> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
> Subject: Re: New WABs
>
> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and b
> factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look significantly
> different.
>
> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's easy.
> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things clearer.
>
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>
>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':
>>
>>
>> Pure WAB:
>>
>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>
>>
>> WAB with background:
>>
>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tritrigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>
>>
>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.
>>
>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.
>>
>>
>> -Bradley
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160805/d12662f5/attachment.html>