[Hps-analysis] mad5VSdata!

[Nathan Baltzell]

I don’t see a fiducial cut being applied in that code?
That would make a significant difference if these plots
have a large contribution from tracks near the ecal edge.
-nathan


On Jul 26, 2016, at 11:33, Luca Colaneri <luca.colaneri at roma2.infn.it> wrote:

> ok, good to know. Still, I did the same on MC, so at least the comparison is consistent.
> 
> Why using Ecal rather tha svt makes it so different?
> 
> 
> Il 26/07/16 16:10, Sho Uemura ha scritto:
>> I think I see a problem - you're histogramming the electron and positron energies (which come from the ECal) instead of the momentum magnitude. That explains why your esum distribution for data looks funny.
>> 
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Luca Colaneri wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Good news everyone!
>>> 
>>> mad5 recon data looks good! pdf in attachment
>>> 
>>> I also attach the piece of code I've been using so far to read recon data (both exp and MC)  using the slcio c++ api.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bests
>>> 
>>> L.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> Luca Colaneri, PhD
> Post-doctorant/ Computational Platforms Consultant
> Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay / University of Connecticut
> Contacts: luca.colaneri at roma2.infn.it
>          colaneri at jlab.org
>          colaneri at ipno.i2p3.fr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis