[Hps-analysis] mad5VSdata!

[Luca Colaneri]

Added the p(e-)<0.8 cut. The code is exctly the same, just substituted 
everywhere E->|p|. Could you please tell me all the cuts that should be 
there to be alligned with everyone else?

thanks!

L.

Il 27/07/16 16:14, Sho Uemura ha scritto:
> Looks weird. Can you send your code again? You should be requiring 
> p(e-)<0.8 but I think there must be some other problem as well.
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Luca Colaneri wrote:
>
>> I removed all info from Ecal, now it's just |p| everywhere....now 
>> everything looks wierder..
>>
>>
>> Il 26/07/16 17:44, Sho Uemura ha scritto:
>>> Yes, the comparison is consistent. But changing to SVT momentum (and 
>>> getting rid of the E(e-)+E(e+)<1.05 cut you have) will make the 
>>> plots consistent with everyone else's.
>>>
>>> Luca: The ECal energy is not completely corrected for edge effects 
>>> (that is impossible). So the (large) fraction of pair events near 
>>> the edges of the ECal often have ECal energies that are lower than 
>>> the SVT momenta, so an Esum distribution made with the ECal will 
>>> always be missing a lot of stuff at high Esum.
>>>
>>> Maurik: Luca's plots do not have a tight fiducial cut. It is 55 mrad 
>>> >= |theta_y| >= 15 mrad.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Luca Colaneri wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok, good to know. Still, I did the same on MC, so at least the 
>>>> comparison is consistent.
>>>>
>>>> Why using Ecal rather tha svt makes it so different?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Il 26/07/16 16:10, Sho Uemura ha scritto:
>>>>> I think I see a problem - you're histogramming the electron and 
>>>>> positron energies (which come from the ECal) instead of the 
>>>>> momentum magnitude. That explains why your esum distribution for 
>>>>> data looks funny.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Luca Colaneri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good news everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mad5 recon data looks good! pdf in attachment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also attach the piece of code I've been using so far to read 
>>>>>> recon data (both exp and MC)  using the slcio c++ api.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bests
>>>>>>
>>>>>> L.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Luca Colaneri, PhD
>>>> Post-doctorant/ Computational Platforms Consultant
>>>> Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay / University of Connecticut
>>>> Contacts: luca.colaneri at roma2.infn.it
>>>>          colaneri at jlab.org
>>>>          colaneri at ipno.i2p3.fr
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Luca Colaneri, PhD
>> Post-doctorant/ Computational Platforms Consultant
>> Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay / University of Connecticut
>> Contacts: luca.colaneri at roma2.infn.it
>>          colaneri at jlab.org
>>          colaneri at ipno.i2p3.fr
>>
>>

-- 
Luca Colaneri, PhD
Post-doctorant/ Computational Platforms Consultant
Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay / University of Connecticut
Contacts: luca.colaneri at roma2.infn.it
           colaneri at jlab.org
           colaneri at ipno.i2p3.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: confronto.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 27483 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160727/c8483589/attachment-0001.pdf>