[Hps-analysis] Fwd: [Clas_offline] Fwd: ENP consumption of disk space under /work
Stepan Stepanyan
stepanya at jlab.org
Thu Jun 1 11:05:47 EDT 2017
FYI, we need to move files.
Stepan
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Harut Avakian <avakian at jlab.org>
> Subject: [Clas_offline] Fwd: ENP consumption of disk space under /work
> Date: June 1, 2017 at 5:01:24 PM GMT+2
> To: "clas_offline at jlab.org" <clas_offline at jlab.org>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> As you can see from the e-mail below, keeping all our work disk space requires some additional funding.
> Option 3 will inevitably impact on farm operations, removing of ~20% space from Lustre.
>
> We can also choose something between options 1) and 3).
> Please revise the content and move at least 75% of what is in /work/clas to either /cache or /volatile?
> The current Hall-B usage includes:
> 550G hallb/bonus
> 1.5T hallb/clase1
> 3.6T hallb/clase1-6
> 3.3T hallb/clase1dvcs
> 2.8T hallb/clase1dvcs2
> 987G hallb/clase1f
> 1.8T hallb/clase2
> 1.6G hallb/clase5
> 413G hallb/clase6
> 2.2T hallb/claseg1
> 3.9T hallb/claseg1dvcs
> 1.2T hallb/claseg3
> 4.1T hallb/claseg4
> 2.7T hallb/claseg5
> 1.7T hallb/claseg6
> 367G hallb/clas-farm-output
> 734G hallb/clasg10
> 601G hallb/clasg11
> 8.1T hallb/clasg12
> 2.4T hallb/clasg13
> 2.4T hallb/clasg14
> 28G hallb/clasg3
> 5.8G hallb/clasg7
> 269G hallb/clasg8
> 1.2T hallb/clasg9
> 1.3T hallb/clashps
> 1.8T hallb/clas-production
> 5.6T hallb/clas-production2
> 1.4T hallb/clas-production3
> 12T hallb/hps
> 13T hallb/prad
>
> Regards,
>
> Harut
>
> P.S. Few times we had crashes and they may also happen in future, so keeping important files in /work is not recommended.
> You can see the list of lost files in /site/scicomp/lostfiles.txt and /site/scicomp/lostfiles-jan-2017.txt
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: ENP consumption of disk space under /work
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 10:35:51 -0400
> From: Chip Watson <watson at jlab.org> <mailto:watson at jlab.org>
> To: Sandy Philpott <philpott at jlab.org> <mailto:philpott at jlab.org>, Graham Heyes <heyes at jlab.org> <mailto:heyes at jlab.org>, Ole Hansen <ole at jlab.org> <mailto:ole at jlab.org>, Harut Avakian <avakian at jlab.org> <mailto:avakian at jlab.org>, Brad Sawatzky <brads at jlab.org> <mailto:brads at jlab.org>, Mark M. Ito <marki at jlab.org> <mailto:marki at jlab.org>
>
> All,
>
> As I have started on the procurement of the new /work file server, I
> have discovered that Physics' use of /work has grown unrestrained over
> the last year or two.
>
> "Unrestrained" because there is no way under Lustre to restrain it
> except via a very unfriendly Lustre quota system. As we leave some
> quota headroom to accommodate large swings in usage for each hall for
> cache and volatile, then /work continues to grow.
>
> Total /work has now reached 260 TB, several times larger than I was
> anticipating. This constitutes more than 25% of Physics' share of
> Lustre, compared to LQCD which uses less than 5% of its disk space on
> the un-managed /work.
>
> It would cost Physics an extra $25K (total $35K - $40K) to treat the 260
> TB as a requirement.
>
> There are 3 paths forward:
>
> (1) Physics cuts its use of /work by a factor of 4-5.
> (2) Physics increases funding to $40K
> (3) We pull a server out of Lustre, decreasing Physics' share of the
> system, and use that as half of the new active-active pair, beefing it
> up with SSDs and perhaps additional memory; this would actually shrink
> Physics near term costs, but puts higher pressure on the file system for
> the farm
>
> The decision is clearly Physics', but I do need a VERY FAST response to
> this question, as I need to move quickly now for LQCD's needs.
>
> Hall D + GlueX, 96 TB
> CLAS + CLAS12, 98 TB
> Hall C, 35 TB
> Hall A <unknown, still scanning>
>
> Email, call (x7101), or drop by today 1:30-3:00 p.m. for discussion.
>
> thanks,
> Chip
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas_offline mailing list
> Clas_offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas_offline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20170601/c1bbd6de/attachment.html>
More information about the Hps-analysis
mailing list