[Hps-analysis] ECal-SVT relative alignment

[Graf, Norman A.]

That's correct. I've been primarily analyzing FEEs, trying to reduce the effects of multiple scattering and also trying to get decent shower development/spread in the ECal to get a good position measurement.

Norman

-----Original Message-----
From: hps-software at slac.stanford.edu <hps-software at slac.stanford.edu> On Behalf Of Nelson, Timothy Knight
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org>
Cc: Graf, Norman A. <ngraf at slac.stanford.edu>; hps-analysis at jlab.org; hps-software <hps-software at slac.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: ECal-SVT relative alignment

Shoot… sorry… Norman’s message said FEEs, not yours.

Tim

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 15:38, Nelson, Timothy Knight <tknelson at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> Our data is totally different, especially for FEE, which is what you are looking at here.
> 
> Who’s looking at FEE’s?  Maybe you’re looking at different plots?
> 


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistserv.slac.stanford.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FSUBED1%3DHPS-SOFTWARE%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Chps-analysis%40jlab.org%7C4c82c2a46dbe48a32ead08d69b68d7a3%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636867271927293229&sdata=4jku2C6EWOsKXCv3MtYBkYCcvB3DHsZbUiPdVo%2Boqiw%3D&reserved=0