<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>Making a half-batch of v9 anyway, just in case (as in, they're already in progress...)<br>
</p>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Maruyama, Takashi <tvm@slac.stanford.edu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 5, 2016 1:41:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Uemura, Sho; Bradley T Yale<br>
<b>Cc:</b> hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: New WABs</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">No, I don't think so. No effects on the multiple scattering in the Si layers or ECal flange/crystal.<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Sho Uemura [<a href="mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu">mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu</a>]
<br>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:08 AM<br>
To: Bradley T Yale<br>
Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Maruyama, Takashi<br>
Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
<br>
Takashi - do we need to repeat our studies of the multiple scattering in GEANT4, so we know the differences between 9.6.p01 and 10.x??<br>
<br>
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
<br>
> Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.<br>
><br>
><br>
> NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):<br>
><br>
> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS<br>
> -EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
><br>
><br>
> OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):<br>
><br>
> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062<br>
> dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
><br>
> Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.<br>
><br>
> Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC should be the only difference between them.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM<br>
> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
><br>
> Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?<br>
><br>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
><br>
>> It's no problem.<br>
>><br>
>> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 vs. 0.0004375 cm).<br>
>><br>
>> ________________________________<br>
>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM<br>
>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>><br>
>> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and <br>
>> b factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look <br>
>> significantly different.<br>
>><br>
>> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's easy.<br>
>> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things clearer.<br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Pure WAB:<br>
>>><br>
>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngR<br>
>>> un2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> WAB with background:<br>
>>><br>
>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tri<br>
>>> trigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-f<br>
>>> ieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> -Bradley<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>