<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>Where were the fixes? Did you change the new v5 detector?</p>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 12, 2016 10:36:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Bradley T Yale<br>
<b>Cc:</b> hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Looks OK now. SLIC will have to be rerun.<br>
<br>
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Sho Uemura wrote:<br>
<br>
> I think we may have screwed up and broken tracking. Should have tested. <br>
> Sorry.<br>
><br>
> Fixing, will hopefully figure it out today.<br>
><br>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Some pure wab, tritrig, and wab-beam-tri are finishing here, using the new <br>
>> detector and various fixes:<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/postTriSummitFixes/recon/<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> ________________________________<br>
>> From: Hps-analysis <hps-analysis-bounces@jlab.org> on behalf of Bradley T <br>
>> Yale <btu29@wildcats.unh.edu><br>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:47:42 PM<br>
>> To: Sho Uemura<br>
>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Thanks a lot.<br>
>> <br>
>> Unleashing it on the farm.<br>
>> <br>
>> ________________________________<br>
>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:24:47 PM<br>
>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>> Cc: Maruyama, Takashi; hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>> <br>
>> New detectors are ready: HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap,<br>
>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap.<br>
>> <br>
>> This detector no longer has carbon fiber dipping past the beam plane (the<br>
>> "third half-module" that Rafo saw), so WAB conversion rate should be<br>
>> correct. None of the active material has moved, so there should be no<br>
>> differences visible in reconstruction.<br>
>> <br>
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>>> Making a half-batch of v9 anyway, just in case (as in, they're already in <br>
>>> progress...)<br>
>>> <br>
>>> ________________________________<br>
>>> From: Maruyama, Takashi <tvm@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:41:59 PM<br>
>>> To: Uemura, Sho; Bradley T Yale<br>
>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>>> Subject: RE: New WABs<br>
>>> <br>
>>> No, I don't think so. No effects on the multiple scattering in the Si <br>
>>> layers or ECal flange/crystal.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>> From: Sho Uemura [<a href="mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu">mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu</a>]<br>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:08 AM<br>
>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Maruyama, Takashi<br>
>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Takashi - do we need to repeat our studies of the multiple scattering in <br>
>>> GEANT4, so we know the differences between 9.6.p01 and 10.x??<br>
>>> <br>
>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>> <br>
>>>> Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS<br>
>>>> -EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062<br>
>>>> dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC <br>
>>>> should be the only difference between them.<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM<br>
>>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>>> It's no problem.<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 <br>
>>>>> vs. 0.0004375 cm).<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM<br>
>>>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
>>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and<br>
>>>>> b factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look<br>
>>>>> significantly different.<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's <br>
>>>>> easy.<br>
>>>>> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things <br>
>>>>> clearer.<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. <br>
>>>>>> Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> Pure WAB:<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngR<br>
>>>>>> un2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> WAB with background:<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tri<br>
>>>>>> trigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-f<br>
>>>>>> ieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator <br>
>>>>>> cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB <br>
>>>>>> double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target <br>
>>>>>> thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>>> -Bradley<br>
>>>>>> <br>
>>>>> <br>
>>>> <br>
>>> <br>
>> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Hps-analysis mailing list<br>
> Hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis</a><br>
><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>