<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>Some 1pt05 GeV recon/dsts are finishing with the newly-fixed detector and jar (wab, tritrig, wab-beam-tri).
<br>
</p>
<p>Same directories, but with a '<span>3.10-20160813</span>' tag:<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><span>/mss/hallb/hps/production/postTriSummitFixes/</span><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>2pt3 GeV will hopefully be done sometime later today as well. <span>I'll let you know when it is.</span></p>
<p>I was going to set run=<span>7984</span> for those, unless you had a better one.<br>
</p>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, August 13, 2016 6:08:16 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Bradley T Yale<br>
<b>Cc:</b> hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Yes, I made a fix (r4465) to the SVT geometry converter (the carbon fiber
<br>
dimensions were being used in a place I didn't expect), and updated the <br>
v5-0 LCDD files accordingly (r4467). So the LCDD used by SLIC and the JAR <br>
used for readout/recon were both affected.<br>
<br>
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
<br>
> Where were the fixes? Did you change the new v5 detector?<br>
><br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:36:30 PM<br>
> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs<br>
><br>
> Looks OK now. SLIC will have to be rerun.<br>
><br>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Sho Uemura wrote:<br>
><br>
>> I think we may have screwed up and broken tracking. Should have tested.<br>
>> Sorry.<br>
>><br>
>> Fixing, will hopefully figure it out today.<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Some pure wab, tritrig, and wab-beam-tri are finishing here, using the new<br>
>>> detector and various fixes:<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/postTriSummitFixes/recon/<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ________________________________<br>
>>> From: Hps-analysis <hps-analysis-bounces@jlab.org> on behalf of Bradley T<br>
>>> Yale <btu29@wildcats.unh.edu><br>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:47:42 PM<br>
>>> To: Sho Uemura<br>
>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>>> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks a lot.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Unleashing it on the farm.<br>
>>><br>
>>> ________________________________<br>
>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:24:47 PM<br>
>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>> Cc: Maruyama, Takashi; hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>><br>
>>> New detectors are ready: HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap,<br>
>>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap.<br>
>>><br>
>>> This detector no longer has carbon fiber dipping past the beam plane (the<br>
>>> "third half-module" that Rafo saw), so WAB conversion rate should be<br>
>>> correct. None of the active material has moved, so there should be no<br>
>>> differences visible in reconstruction.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Making a half-batch of v9 anyway, just in case (as in, they're already in<br>
>>>> progress...)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>> From: Maruyama, Takashi <tvm@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:41:59 PM<br>
>>>> To: Uemura, Sho; Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>>>> Subject: RE: New WABs<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> No, I don't think so. No effects on the multiple scattering in the Si<br>
>>>> layers or ECal flange/crystal.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>>> From: Sho Uemura [<a href="mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu">mailto:meeg@slac.stanford.edu</a>]<br>
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:08 AM<br>
>>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Maruyama, Takashi<br>
>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Takashi - do we need to repeat our studies of the multiple scattering in<br>
>>>> GEANT4, so we know the differences between 9.6.p01 and 10.x??<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS<br>
>>>>> -EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062<br>
>>>>> dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC<br>
>>>>> should be the only difference between them.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM<br>
>>>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
>>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>> It's no problem.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062<br>
>>>>>> vs. 0.0004375 cm).<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg@slac.stanford.edu><br>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM<br>
>>>>>> To: Bradley T Yale<br>
>>>>>> Cc: hps-analysis@jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama<br>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and<br>
>>>>>> b factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look<br>
>>>>>> significantly different.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's<br>
>>>>>> easy.<br>
>>>>>> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things<br>
>>>>>> clearer.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon.<br>
>>>>>>> Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Pure WAB:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngR<br>
>>>>>>> un2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> WAB with background:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tri<br>
>>>>>>> trigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-f<br>
>>>>>>> ieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator<br>
>>>>>>> cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB<br>
>>>>>>> double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target<br>
>>>>>>> thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> -Bradley<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Hps-analysis mailing list<br>
>> Hps-analysis@jlab.org<br>
>> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>