<div dir="auto">It looks like it picked up the wrong svt_calibrations. I'll check. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On May 23, 2017 6:06 PM, "Nathan Baltzell" <<a href="mailto:baltzell@jlab.org">baltzell@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
2017-05-23 16:06:09 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: using steering resource /org/hps/steering/recon/<wbr>PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:09 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set max events to 10000<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager addVariableDefinition :: outputFile = out<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set steering variable: outputFile=out<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager initializeLoop :: initializing LCSim loop<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:10 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager initializeLoop :: Event marker printing disabled.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager resetInstance :: DatabaseConditionsManager instance is reset<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager setupInputFiles :: No input files in XML file.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.<wbr>EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: minLookbackEvents: 5<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.<wbr>EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: maxLookbackEvents: 40<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.recon.ecal.<wbr>EcalRunningPedestalDriver startOfData :: maxLookbackTime:-1<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: LCSim job manager was successfully configured.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: User set detector to HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-<wbr>4-fieldmap with command option.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: User set run number to 7796 with command option.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: The job will include the following EVIO files ...<br>
in.evio<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio setupEventBuilder :: using Eng Run event builder<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager setDetector :: new detector HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-<wbr>4-fieldmap and run #7796<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager initialize :: initializing with detector HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-<wbr>4-fieldmap and run 7796<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager setXmlConfig :: setting XML config from resource /org/hps/conditions/config/<wbr>conditions_database_engrun.xml<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager loadConfiguration :: setupSvtDetector = true<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager loadConfiguration :: freezeAfterInitialize = false<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager registerConverters :: registering default conditions converters<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager openConnection :: opening connection ...<br>
connection: jdbc:mysql://<a href="http://hpsdb.jlab.org:3306/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">hpsdb.jlab.org:<wbr>3306/</a><br>
host: <a href="http://hpsdb.jlab.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">hpsdb.jlab.org</a><br>
port: 3306<br>
user: hpsuser<br>
database: hps_conditions<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:14 [INFO] org.hps.run.database.<wbr>RunManager setRun :: setting run 7796<br>
Field Map location: fieldmap/209acm2_5kg_<wbr>corrected_unfolded_scaled_1.<wbr>04545.dat<br>
------------------------------<wbr>-----------------------------<br>
FieldMap3D<br>
------------------------------<wbr>-----------------------------<br>
Reading the field grid from fieldmap/209acm2_5kg_<wbr>corrected_unfolded_scaled_1.<wbr>04545.dat ...<br>
1 X(mm)<br>
2 Y(mm)<br>
3 Z(mm)<br>
4 BX(1000T)<br>
5 BY(1000T)<br>
6 BZ(1000T)<br>
0 End of Header. Data follows in above format<br>
<br>
---> ... done reading<br>
---> assumed the order: x, y, z, Bx, By, Bz<br>
---> Min values x,y,z: -250.0 -70.0 -1500.0<br>
---> Max values x,y,z: 250.0 70.0 1500.0<br>
Maximum Field strength: 0.5312369527704992<br>
---> The field will be offset by 21.17 0.0 457.2<br>
<br>
---> Range of values x,y,z: 500.0 140.0 3000.0<br>
------------------------------<wbr>-----------------------------<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.<wbr>converter.HPSTrackerBuilder <init> :: mille parameters will be read from compact.xml file<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.<wbr>converter.<wbr>HPSTracker2014GeometryDefiniti<wbr>on build :: HPSTracker2014v1GeometryDefini<wbr>tion: Constructed 14 geometry objects<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.geometry.compact.<wbr>converter.<wbr>HPSTracker2014GeometryDefiniti<wbr>on build :: HPSTracker2014v1GeometryDefini<wbr>tion: Constructed 12 module bundles<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.detector.converter.<wbr>compact.HPSEcal3Converter makeSubdetectorDetectorElement :: creating detector element for subdetector Ecal<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.lcsim.detector.converter.<wbr>compact.HPSEcal3Converter convert :: converting subdetector Ecal<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.<wbr>SvtDetectorSetup conditionsChanged :: activating default setup<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 314<br>
name: svt_channels<br>
runStart: 2000<br>
runEnd: 999999<br>
tableName: svt_channels<br>
collectionId: 2<br>
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:37.0<br>
created: 2015-03-15 23:44:16.0<br>
tag: eng_run<br>
createdBy: omoreno<br>
notes: Engineering run SVT channel IDs. Loaded using SvtConditionsLoader.<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 313<br>
name: svt_daq_map<br>
runStart: 2000<br>
runEnd: 999999<br>
tableName: svt_daq_map<br>
collectionId: 2<br>
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:37.0<br>
created: 2015-03-15 23:44:05.0<br>
tag: eng_run<br>
createdBy: omoreno<br>
notes: Engineering run DAQ map. Loaded using SvtConditionsLoader.<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1316<br>
name: svt_t0_shifts<br>
runStart: 2000<br>
runEnd: 9999<br>
tableName: svt_t0_shifts<br>
collectionId: 1940<br>
updated: 2015-12-02 19:45:02.0<br>
created: 2015-12-02 19:45:02.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: uemura<br>
notes: null<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:24 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 324<br>
name: svt_calibrations<br>
runStart: 4823<br>
runEnd: 999999<br>
tableName: svt_calibrations<br>
collectionId: 3<br>
updated: 2016-12-05 22:10:43.0<br>
created: 2015-04-20 02:01:55.0<br>
tag: eng_run<br>
createdBy: omoreno<br>
notes: Pedestals and noise generated using run 4823.<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1342<br>
name: svt_shape_fit_parameters<br>
runStart: 7486<br>
runEnd: 9000<br>
tableName: svt_shape_fit_parameters<br>
collectionId: 1959<br>
updated: 2016-02-21 20:56:13.0<br>
created: 2016-02-12 21:02:27.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: meeg<br>
notes: null<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 315<br>
name: svt_gains<br>
runStart: 2000<br>
runEnd: 999999<br>
tableName: svt_gains<br>
collectionId: 2<br>
updated: 2015-05-04 16:26:12.0<br>
created: 2015-03-26 00:26:33.0<br>
tag: eng_run<br>
createdBy: omoreno<br>
notes: Dummy engineering run SVT channel gains.<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.<wbr>SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: loading default SVT conditions onto subdetector Tracker<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.<wbr>SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: setting up 36 SVT sensors<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.detector.svt.<wbr>SvtDetectorSetup loadDefault :: channel map has 23040 entries<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1423<br>
name: ecal_channels<br>
runStart: 7032<br>
runEnd: 7874<br>
tableName: ecal_channels<br>
collectionId: 2017<br>
updated: 2016-03-17 17:20:44.0<br>
created: 2016-03-17 17:20:43.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: baltzell<br>
notes: swapping<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 2388<br>
name: ecal_gains<br>
runStart: 7000<br>
runEnd: 9999<br>
tableName: ecal_gains<br>
collectionId: 2976<br>
updated: 2016-11-01 14:43:58.0<br>
created: 2016-11-01 14:43:58.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: holly<br>
notes: adjusted single channel gain which was very low for testing<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1354<br>
name: ecal_calibrations<br>
runStart: 7350<br>
runEnd: 99999<br>
tableName: ecal_calibrations<br>
collectionId: 1970<br>
updated: 2016-02-21 11:03:28.0<br>
created: 2016-02-21 11:03:27.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: baltzell<br>
notes: 200nA peds, DAC3280, nosplitter<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1424<br>
name: ecal_time_shifts<br>
runStart: 7000<br>
runEnd: 99999<br>
tableName: ecal_time_shifts<br>
collectionId: 2018<br>
updated: 2016-03-21 10:47:10.0<br>
created: 2016-03-21 10:47:09.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: holly<br>
notes: time offsets corrected for cable swap<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 414<br>
name: ecal_pulse_widths<br>
runStart: 0<br>
runEnd: 99999999<br>
tableName: ecal_pulse_widths<br>
collectionId: 1034<br>
updated: 2015-07-07 17:53:01.0<br>
created: 2015-07-07 17:53:01.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: nab<br>
notes: 3-pole pulse widths measured from 2015 data<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 2026<br>
name: svt_bias_constants<br>
runStart: 7796<br>
runEnd: 7796<br>
tableName: svt_bias_constants<br>
collectionId: 2614<br>
updated: 2016-09-22 09:02:44.0<br>
created: 2016-09-22 09:02:44.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: spaul<br>
notes: constants from mya<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 2271<br>
name: svt_motor_positions<br>
runStart: 7796<br>
runEnd: 7796<br>
tableName: svt_motor_positions<br>
collectionId: 2859<br>
updated: 2016-09-22 09:02:49.0<br>
created: 2016-09-22 09:02:49.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: spaul<br>
notes: constants from mya<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1415<br>
name: svt_timing_constants<br>
runStart: 7795<br>
runEnd: 7809<br>
tableName: svt_timing_constants<br>
collectionId: 1974<br>
updated: 2016-03-16 21:44:41.0<br>
created: 2016-03-16 21:44:41.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: hpsrun<br>
notes: null<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.<wbr>LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: TI time offset set to 1457264884019099456 for run 7796 from database<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.<wbr>LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: Closing run manager db connection ...<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.<wbr>LCSimEngRunEventBuilder setTiTimeOffsetForRun :: Run manager db connection was closed.<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager initialize :: conditions system initialized successfully<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [CONFIG] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager freeze :: conditions system is frozen<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:25 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: Opening EVIO file in.evio<br>
Reading sequentially for evio versions 4<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EcalEvioReader makeHits :: ECal format tag: 0xe101<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: first physics event time: 1457265516 - Sun Mar 06 06:58:36 EST 2016<br>
detector changed<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>AbstractConditionsObjectConver<wbr>ter getData :: loading conditions set...<br>
id: 1422<br>
name: ecal_time_walk<br>
runStart: 7000<br>
runEnd: 99999<br>
tableName: ecal_time_walk<br>
collectionId: 2016<br>
updated: 2016-03-17 09:49:52.0<br>
created: 2016-03-17 09:49:51.0<br>
tag: null<br>
createdBy: holly<br>
notes: time walk parameters for 2016 run<br>
<br>
2017-05-23 16:06:26 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12660624 with sequence 0<br>
2017-05-23 16:09:12 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12661624 with sequence 1000<br>
2017-05-23 16:12:25 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12662624 with sequence 2000<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.01840393600284658, -0.09382267973014823, -0.00297076545125808, 0.0956568112551805, 698.6345963812555, -718.8106636201552, -35.29517036303837, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -0.44304712479552893<br>
phi0= 0.16573422893898002<br>
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862<br>
z0= 1.2547213257138372<br>
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -0.44304712479552893<br>
phi0= 0.16573422893898002<br>
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862<br>
z0= 1.2547213257138372<br>
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 710.03, 72.034, -29.845], unit w=[ 0.99952, 0.030891, -0.00016092]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 709.80, 79.573, -10.465]<br>
helix pos=[ 710.03, -601.30, -31.621] dir=[ 0.00033751, -0.99952, -0.031056]<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.01840393600284658, -0.09382267973014823, -0.00297076545125808, 0.0956568112551805, 698.6345963812555, -718.8106636201552, -35.29517036303837, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -0.44304712479552893<br>
phi0= 0.16573422893898002<br>
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862<br>
z0= 1.2547213257138372<br>
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -0.44304712479552893<br>
phi0= 0.16573422893898002<br>
curvature: 0.0016409089305043862<br>
z0= 1.2547213257138372<br>
tanLambda= -0.03107148471696738<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 710.03, 72.034, -29.845], unit w=[ 0.99952, 0.030891, -0.00016092]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 709.80, 79.573, -10.465]<br>
helix pos=[ 710.03, -601.30, -31.621] dir=[ 0.00033751, -0.99952, -0.031056]<br>
2017-05-23 16:15:30 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12663624 with sequence 3000<br>
2017-05-23 16:18:16 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12664624 with sequence 4000<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.016553826426261777, -0.09166529190423306, 0.004913027406204339, 0.0932775039735368, 676.9208124269511, -700.0012928385588, 58.78862314834698, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -7.942727750134551<br>
phi0= 0.15460493410097412<br>
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699<br>
z0= -0.8380036540888941<br>
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -7.942727750134551<br>
phi0= 0.15460493410097412<br>
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699<br>
z0= -0.8380036540888941<br>
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 686.37, 71.419, 29.612], unit w=[ -0.99957, -0.029415, 0.00061939]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 684.93, 120.02, 15.507]<br>
helix pos=[ 686.37, -593.29, 53.130] dir=[ 0.0020147, -0.99861, 0.052671]<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.016553826426261777, -0.09166529190423306, 0.004913027406204339, 0.0932775039735368, 676.9208124269511, -700.0012928385588, 58.78862314834698, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -7.942727750134551<br>
phi0= 0.15460493410097412<br>
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699<br>
z0= -0.8380036540888941<br>
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -7.942727750134551<br>
phi0= 0.15460493410097412<br>
curvature: 0.0016842911916920699<br>
z0= -0.8380036540888941<br>
tanLambda= 0.052744299277671325<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 686.37, 71.419, 29.612], unit w=[ -0.99957, -0.029415, 0.00061939]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 684.93, 120.02, 15.507]<br>
helix pos=[ 686.37, -593.29, 53.130] dir=[ 0.0020147, -0.99861, 0.052671]<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.014869222351264314, -0.08074024802126362, 0.0013372266626372443, 0.08210888867238289, 680.8313203336338, -600.2035973952139, 19.760683467841634, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -8.762077826802761<br>
phi0= 0.3176859982395852<br>
curvature: 0.001910989345322372<br>
z0= 2.112052695486681<br>
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -8.762077826802761<br>
phi0= 0.3176859982395852<br>
curvature: 0.001910989345322372<br>
z0= 2.112052695486681<br>
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.19, 10.645, 9.8025]<br>
helix pos=[ 689.48, -504.11, 18.187] dir=[ 0.0025155, -0.99986, 0.016286]<br>
WTrack: this track started to go backwards?! params [WTrack params [-0.014869222351264314, -0.08074024802126362, 0.0013372266626372443, 0.08210888867238289, 680.8313203336338, -600.2035973952139, 19.760683467841634, ]<br>
with corresponding HelicalTrackFit:<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -8.762077826802761<br>
phi0= 0.3176859982395852<br>
curvature: 0.001910989345322372<br>
z0= 2.112052695486681<br>
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477<br>
]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= -8.762077826802761<br>
phi0= 0.3176859982395852<br>
curvature: 0.001910989345322372<br>
z0= 2.112052695486681<br>
tanLambda= 0.016288176088411477<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.19, 10.645, 9.8025]<br>
helix pos=[ 689.48, -504.11, 18.187] dir=[ 0.0025155, -0.99986, 0.016286]<br>
2017-05-23 16:21:23 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12665624 with sequence 5000<br>
2017-05-23 16:24:30 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12666624 with sequence 6000<br>
2017-05-23 16:27:47 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12667624 with sequence 7000<br>
2017-05-23 16:30:42 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12668624 with sequence 8000<br>
2017-05-23 16:33:48 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver process :: Event 12669624 with sequence 9000<br>
getPathLengthToPlaneApprox ERROR t is negative (-0.0668202694390133)!<br>
p 0.09937864235165567 rho 0.0015786933435923008 a 1.568884011757987E-4 A -7.888269091345609E-4 B -0.0347624769813046 C -21.56008449291011<br>
track params: 2.3272447819938473E-4, 0.09937301051644304, -0.001032073579953381, 0.09937864235165567, 689.4837807539794, 635.5724794378402, 17.43025643619811,<br>
xp [ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571]<br>
eta [ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
h [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= 6.118759018647729<br>
phi0= 6.1953747778289125<br>
curvature: -0.0015787784844687803<br>
z0= 28.325818280857433<br>
tanLambda= -0.010385825530806936<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.08, 13.800, 23.888]<br>
helix pos=[ 689.48, 635.63, 17.430] dir=[ 0.0022525, 0.99994, -0.010385]<br>
getPathLengthToPlaneApprox ERROR t is negative (-0.0668202694390133)!<br>
p 0.09937864235165567 rho 0.0015786933435923008 a 1.568884011757987E-4 A -7.888269091345609E-4 B -0.0347624769813046 C -21.56008449291011<br>
track params: 2.3272447819938473E-4, 0.09937301051644304, -0.001032073579953381, 0.09937864235165567, 689.4837807539794, 635.5724794378402, 17.43025643619811,<br>
xp [ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571]<br>
eta [ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
h [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000]<br>
MultipleScattering: iterative intercept failed for helix<br>
HelicalTrackFit:<br>
d0= 6.118759018647729<br>
phi0= 6.1953747778289125<br>
curvature: -0.0015787784844687803<br>
z0= 28.325818280857433<br>
tanLambda= -0.010385825530806936<br>
<br>
at sensor with org=[ 689.48, -29.417, 29.571], unit w=[ -0.99947, -0.032426, -0.00023661]<br>
MultipleScattering: => use simple intercept pos=[ 688.08, 13.800, 23.888]<br>
helix pos=[ 689.48, 635.63, 17.430] dir=[ 0.0022525, 0.99994, -0.010385]<br>
2017-05-23 16:36:35 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run :: maxEvents 10000 was reached<br>
2017-05-23 16:36:35 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver endOfDat<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On May 23, 2017, at 8:50 PM, "McCormick, Jeremy I." <<a href="mailto:jeremym@slac.stanford.edu">jeremym@slac.stanford.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Rafo, can you check in the log file for these jobs what is being loaded for the ‘svt_calibrations’ conditions set and reply with that information?<br>
><br>
> It should be printed out during the job initialization.<br>
><br>
> From: <a href="mailto:hps-software@slac.stanford.edu">hps-software@slac.stanford.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:hps-software@slac.stanford.edu">hps-software@slac.<wbr>stanford.edu</a>] On Behalf Of Rafayel Paremuzyan<br>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 4:34 PM<br>
> To: Graf, Norman A.; Graham, Mathew Thomas<br>
> Cc: Omar Moreno; <a href="mailto:hps-analysis@jlab.org">hps-analysis@jlab.org</a>; hps-software<br>
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status<br>
><br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> Ok, outputs from Jun2016 recon, and the one from new recon are different.<br>
> Reminder that, I have used same jar file, same detector same steering file.<br>
><br>
> Attached figures represent comparison of 1st 20K events from file 7796.20<br>
> ECal data is almost identical, attached is the cluster_X distribution comparison from two files.<br>
> Blue is the June2016 recon file, and red is new recon file.<br>
><br>
> SVT data is different, it has more 3D hits and more tracks.<br>
> Which is probably causing it to run slower.<br>
><br>
> Since both reconstructions use "Same" jar same steering files, same geometry (v4-4),<br>
> Then it is probably something has been changed in the Database.<br>
><br>
> Probably SVT experts who have modified the database since Jun 2016, can have a look into<br>
> to see if there is something that can cause this.<br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 05/22/2017 03:46 PM, Graf, Norman A. wrote:<br>
> Hello Rafo,<br>
><br>
> I agree that the most concerning issue is the non-reproducibility of the pass0 results.<br>
><br>
> Norman<br>
><br>
><br>
> From: <a href="mailto:hps-software@slac.stanford.edu">hps-software@slac.stanford.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:hps-software@slac.stanford.edu">hps-software@slac.<wbr>stanford.edu</a>] On Behalf Of Rafayel Paremuzyan<br>
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 12:25 PM<br>
> To: Graham, Mathew Thomas <<a href="mailto:mgraham@slac.stanford.edu">mgraham@slac.stanford.edu</a>><br>
> Cc: Omar Moreno <<a href="mailto:email@omarmoreno.net">email@omarmoreno.net</a>>; <a href="mailto:hps-analysis@jlab.org">hps-analysis@jlab.org</a>; hps-software <<a href="mailto:hps-software@slac.stanford.edu">hps-software@slac.stanford.<wbr>edu</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status<br>
><br>
> ….ARE the occupancies x2 higher???<br>
> This was just a naive assumption, also I assumed the computing time doesn't linearly depend on occupancies,<br>
> I was more wondered, that I can not reproduce the code speed that we had 6 months ago.<br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 05/22/2017 03:19 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas wrote:<br>
><br>
> 2.3 GeV data recon speed is x2 slower than the 1.05 data recon speed.<br>
> This is concerning, but maybe there is a good reason for that, i.e. might be hit occupancies are high etc,<br>
><br>
><br>
> ….ARE the occupancies x2 higher???<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> but the other thing, that seems puzzling, is recon speed for 2.3 GeV data is now more than x2 slower<br>
> using the same hps-java version, same detector, same java version, as we did for pass0.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Ok, that’s legit weird.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas wrote:<br>
><br>
> Sorry to ask a dumb question…but I will anyway.<br>
><br>
> This is a “2.3 GeV vs 1.05 GeV” issue? Or an hps-java version issue?<br>
><br>
> On May 22, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Omar Moreno <<a href="mailto:email@omarmoreno.net">email@omarmoreno.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Jeremy has also profiled the recon before so if Maurik can't do it, I'm sure he can.<br>
><br>
> On May 22, 2017 11:46 AM, "Rafayel Paremuzyan" <<a href="mailto:rafopar@jlab.org">rafopar@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Alessandra and all,<br>
><br>
> Yes clearly I see that pattern as well,<br>
> going to the faster machine (pumpkin1), as Maurik suggested,<br>
> recon speed increased, but 2016 recon was about x2 slower than the 2015 recon speed.<br>
> I also tried to with -Xms=4000m -Xmx=4000m options, and without that options,<br>
> but I didn't notice noticeable speed improvement.<br>
><br>
> Another thing that is *concering* is I run<br>
> same jar on batch farms, centos6. and centos7, and<br>
> can't get same speed as we got during the pass0.<br>
> Note, jar is the same, detector is the same, run number and file number is the same.<br>
> Difference is the time when it started to tun (Oct 19 2016 vs May 21 2017)<br>
><br>
> If someone is interested to look at job log files<br>
> The log file that I run yesterday: /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/<wbr>data/physrun2016/tpass1/logs/<wbr>hps_008054.27_pass0XML.err<br>
> The log file that run on Oct 19 2016 for pass0 /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/<wbr>data/physrun2016/pass0/logs/<wbr>hps_008054.27_R3.9.err<br>
><br>
> I have never done profiling with java.<br>
> I know Maurik is in workshop, he might not have time to do this,<br>
> if someone else is set up doing this, it will probably be useful.<br>
><br>
> Also, I noticed /group/hps is full<br>
><br>
> Has anyone recently put some data there?<br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 05/22/2017 04:04 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:<br>
> Hi Maurik, Rafo and all,<br>
> I think that the different Java VM could impact on the absolute speed comparing different machines and jar versions compiled in different times... but I am running the same jar (hps-java 3.10, compiled afresh at slac on rhel6-64, jvm 1.7.0) on 2015 and 2016 data, and the factor ~2 of speed decrease for newer data is striking (whichever geometry version).<br>
> About garbage collection, I don't use any flag in compilation, so it acts in default mode in both cases.<br>
><br>
> Are 2016 data affected by more noisy hits that could extend the reconstruction time over testing all different strategies, to your knowledge?<br>
> cheers<br>
> Alessandra<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sun, 21 May 2017, Maurik Holtrop wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello Rafo,<br>
> One thing that probably is different between the last time we ran with the 3.8 jar and now<br>
> is a different version of the Java VM. It could well be that the newer version of Java is<br>
> not faster. Also, it is tricky to compare Endeavour with the Jlab farm computers. They are<br>
> probably not equivalent in speed. At UNH, Pumpkin has the more modern processors, whereas<br>
> Endeavour is now ~5 years old.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Maurik<br>
><br>
> On May 21, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Rafayel Paremuzyan <<a href="mailto:rafopar@jlab.org">rafopar@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Alessandra, Norman, all<br>
><br>
> thank you for replay and your tests.<br>
><br>
> I tested both 2015 and 2016 data using v4-4 detector on UNH computers.<br>
> I have use 3.8 JAR (the jar for 2015 pass6). 3.9 JAR (the jar for 2016 pass0 recon),<br>
> and the NEW jar v051717 (the newest jar tag is v051717)<br>
><br>
> Ok, I also noticed that recon of 2015 data is faster that 2016 data.<br>
> Also seems the new jar is 20% slower than the 3.9 jar for 2016 data, and about 60%<br>
> slower for 2015 data.<br>
> now recon speed is about 2.55 EV/S for 2015 data, This is too slow<br>
> it cause more than 40h for a single file.<br>
><br>
> Ths is summary of code speeds with different jar files<br>
> V4-4 Detector, UNH (endeavour), 5K events are reconstructed<br>
><br>
> Events per second<br>
> Events per second<br>
> Events per second<br>
><br>
> 3.8JAR (2015 recon jar)<br>
> 3.9JAR, 2016 pass0 recon jar<br>
> v051717JAR, jar vor tpass1<br>
> 2015 Data 5772, file 20<br>
> 5.07<br>
> 5.19<br>
> 3.157<br>
> 2016 Data file 25<br>
><br>
> 3.11<br>
> 2.53<br>
><br>
> *However* I looked into job Wall times for pass0 recon.<br>
> The recon speed is more than 7.4 Events/sec, which is about x3 faster than with the<br>
> new JAR.<br>
><br>
> I again checked *same 3.9 jar*, which is slower again.<br>
> I don't know why now the code speed is so low!<br>
><br>
><br>
> Norman, I have tried the "-<wbr>DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants"<wbr>, but it didn't work<br>
><br>
> =================The command===============<br>
> java -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp hps-distribution-3.11-v051717-<wbr>bin.jar<br>
> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x /org/hps/steering/recon/<wbr>PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r<br>
> -d HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-<wbr>fieldmap_globalAlign -R 7796 -DoutputFile=out_7796_0<br>
> -DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants hps_007796.evio.25 -n 10000<br>
><br>
> ============The error backtrache============<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: using steering<br>
> resource /org/hps/steering/recon/<wbr>PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set max events to<br>
> 10000<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [INFO] org.hps.rundb.RunManager <init> :: ConnectionParameters {<br>
> database: hps_run_db_v2, hostname:<a href="http://hpsdb.jlab.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">hpsdb.jlab.org</a>, password: darkphoton, port: 3306,<br>
> user: hpsuser }<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager addVariableDefinition<br>
> :: outputFile = out_7796_0<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: set steering variable:<br>
> outputFile=out_7796_0<br>
> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [SEVERE] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse :: bad variable format:<br>
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants<br>
> java.lang.<wbr>IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:<br>
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants<br>
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:393)<br>
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:97)<br>
><br>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.<wbr>IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:<br>
> disableSvtAlignmentConstants<br>
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:393)<br>
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:97)<br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 05/20/2017 06:17 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:<br>
> Hi Rafo, all,<br>
> I also noticed that the reconstruction for 2016 data is about twice as<br>
> slow as compared to 2015 (whichever geometry and reconstruction<br>
> version).<br>
> This happens when I run the aligned geometry as well as the "current"<br>
> one (v5.0), and the geometry taken from the db as well (the result is<br>
> the same as v5.0). I did not make any test with v4.4, though - actually<br>
> as far as svt alignment is concerned it should be the same as v5.0. Can<br>
> you please try and make the same short test with the newest jar with<br>
> v4.4?<br>
> This happens to me both with hps-java 5.10 and 5.11 (not the most<br>
> updated one).<br>
><br>
> I would be surprised if it could be something connected to the<br>
> alignment, unless for some reason new positions and harder tracks<br>
> trigger some long loops in the reconstruction. But this happens (to me)<br>
> also with the<br>
> standard geometry, so a check with the one used with pass0 (that should<br>
> however be equivalent to v5.0) could at least help to rule out, or blame<br>
> on, the alignment step.<br>
> Thanks, cheers<br>
> Alessandra<br>
><br>
><br>
> ps. make also sure that the correct fieldmap is called in all the<br>
> compact files - you never know!<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Rafayel Paremuzyan wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> During the testing the recon for test pass1,<br>
> I noticed the recon time is more than x2 longer wrt pass0<br>
> recon time.<br>
><br>
> To demonstrate it<br>
> I submit 3 simple jobs with 10K events to reconstruct, with<br>
> new pass1 xml<br>
> file (this has the new jar v051717, and the new detector<br>
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-<wbr>fieldmap_globalAlign),<br>
> and the old pass0 xml file (pass0 jar release 3.9, and the<br>
> detector<br>
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-<wbr>4-fieldmap)<br>
><br>
> Below is a printout from the jobs with a new JAR, v051717,<br>
> the average time<br>
> for 1000 events is more than 7 minutes<br>
> ===================== LOG from the v051717 JAR<br>
> ==============================<br>
> 2017-05-19 09:36:51 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10614074 with sequence 0<br>
> 2017-05-19 09:43:13 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10615074 with sequence 1000<br>
> 2017-05-19 09:49:18 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10616074 with sequence 2000<br>
> 2017-05-19 09:55:54 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10617074 with sequence 3000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:02:55 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10618074 with sequence 4000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:09:57 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10619074 with sequence 5000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:16:13 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10620074 with sequence 6000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:25:20 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10621074 with sequence 7000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:32:56 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10622074 with sequence 8000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:36:19 [WARNING]<br>
> org.hps.recon.tracking.<wbr>TrackerReconDriver<br>
> process :: Discarding track with bad HelicalTrackHit<br>
> (correction distance<br>
> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:42:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10623074 with sequence 9000<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::<br>
> maxEvents 10000<br>
> was reached<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> endOfData ::<br>
> 10000 events processed in job.<br>
> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::<br>
> Job finished<br>
> successfully!<br>
><br>
><br>
> And below is the Job log info from the pass0 jar. The<br>
> average time for 1000<br>
> events is less than 3 minutes<br>
> ===================== LOG from the 3.9 release JAR<br>
> ==============================<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:19:46 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10614074 with sequence 0<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:23:36 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10615074 with sequence 1000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:27:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10616074 with sequence 2000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:30:40 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10617074 with sequence 3000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:34:20 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10618074 with sequence 4000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:38:11 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10619074 with sequence 5000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:41:43 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10620074 with sequence 6000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:45:54 [WARNING]<br>
> org.hps.recon.tracking.<wbr>TrackerReconDriver<br>
> process :: Discarding track with bad HelicalTrackHit<br>
> (correction distance<br>
> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:46:05 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10621074 with sequence 7000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:50:08 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10622074 with sequence 8000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:55:03 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> process :: Event<br>
> 10623074 with sequence 9000<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::<br>
> maxEvents 10000<br>
> was reached<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>EventMarkerDriver<br>
> endOfData ::<br>
> 10000 events processed in job.<br>
> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::<br>
> Job finished<br>
> successfully!<br>
><br>
> I also tried to do reconstruction by myself interactively,<br>
> but I am getting<br>
> error below,<br>
><br>
> The command<br>
> /apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7/bin/<wbr>java -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp<br>
> hps-distribution-3.9-bin.jar org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x<br>
> /org/hps/steering/recon/<wbr>PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r -d<br>
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-<wbr>fieldmap_globalAlign -R 7796<br>
> -DoutputFile=out_7796_0<br>
> hps_007796.evio.0 -n 10000<br>
><br>
> The Error traceback<br>
> 017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse ::<br>
> using steering<br>
> resource<br>
> /org/hps/steering/recon/<wbr>PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse<br>
> :: set max events<br>
> to 10000<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]<br>
> org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager<br>
> addVariableDefinition :: outputFile = out_7796_0<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse<br>
> :: set steering<br>
> variable: outputFile=out_7796_0<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager<br>
> initializeLoop<br>
> :: initializing LCSim loop<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG] org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager<br>
> initializeLoop<br>
> :: Event marker printing disabled.<br>
> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [INFO]<br>
> org.hps.conditions.database.<wbr>DatabaseConditionsManager<br>
> resetInstance ::<br>
> DatabaseConditionsManager instance is reset<br>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.<wbr>UnsatisfiedLinkError:<br>
> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_<wbr>75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.<wbr>so:<br>
> libXext.so.6:<br>
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory<br>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader$<wbr>NativeLibrary.load(Native<br>
> Method)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1965)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1890)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1851)<br>
> at java.lang.Runtime.load0(<wbr>Runtime.java:795)<br>
> at java.lang.System.load(System.<wbr>java:1062)<br>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader$<wbr>NativeLibrary.load(Native<br>
> Method)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1965)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1890)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.ClassLoader.<wbr>loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:<wbr>1872)<br>
> at java.lang.Runtime.<wbr>loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:849)<br>
> at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(<wbr>System.java:1088)<br>
> at<br>
> sun.security.action.<wbr>LoadLibraryAction.run(<wbr>LoadLibraryAction.java:67)<br>
> at<br>
> sun.security.action.<wbr>LoadLibraryAction.run(<wbr>LoadLibraryAction.java:47)<br>
> at<br>
> java.security.<wbr>AccessController.doPrivileged(<wbr>Native Method)<br>
> at<br>
> java.awt.Toolkit.<wbr>loadLibraries(Toolkit.java:<wbr>1653)<br>
> at java.awt.Toolkit.<clinit>(<wbr>Toolkit.java:1682)<br>
> at java.awt.Component.<clinit>(<wbr>Component.java:595)<br>
> at org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.<<wbr>init>(AIDA.java:68)<br>
> at<br>
> org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.<wbr>defaultInstance(AIDA.java:53)<br>
> at<br>
> org.hps.evio.RfFitterDriver.<<wbr>init>(RfFitterDriver.java:31)<br>
> at<br>
> sun.reflect.<wbr>NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.<wbr>newInstance0(Native<br>
> Method)<br>
> atsun.reflect.<wbr>NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.<wbr>newInstance(<wbr>NativeConstructorAcce<br>
> ssorImpl.java:57)<br>
> atsun.reflect.<wbr>DelegatingConstructorAccessorI<wbr>mpl.newInstance(<wbr>DelegatingConstru<br>
> ctorAccessorImpl.java:45)<br>
> at<br>
> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.<wbr>newInstance(Constructor.java:<wbr>526)<br>
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(<wbr>Class.java:379)<br>
> at<br>
> org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager.<wbr>setupDrivers(<wbr>JobControlManager.java:1199)<br>
> at<br>
> org.hps.job.JobManager.<wbr>setupDrivers(JobManager.java:<wbr>82)<br>
> at<br>
> org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager.setup(<wbr>JobControlManager.java:1052)<br>
> at<br>
> org.lcsim.job.<wbr>JobControlManager.setup(<wbr>JobControlManager.java:1110)<br>
> at<br>
> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:407)<br>
> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(<wbr>EvioToLcio.java:97)<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I see this library libXext.so.6: in /usr/lib64, but not in<br>
> /usr/lib,<br>
> when I put /usr/lib64 in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then it<br>
> complaines again (see<br>
> below)<br>
><br>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.<wbr>UnsatisfiedLinkError:<br>
> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_<wbr>75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.<wbr>so:<br>
> libXext.so.6:<br>
> wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64<br>
><br>
> I would appreciate, if I get some help on running the<br>
> reconstruction<br>
> interactively, then I could look more closely into logs<br>
> of the old, and new JAR files.<br>
><br>
> Rafo<br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>______________________________<wbr>________________<br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the<br>
> following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.<wbr>com/v2/url?u=https-3A__<wbr>listserv.slac.stanford.edu_<wbr>cgi-2Dbin</a><br>
> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-<wbr>26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=<wbr>lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI<wbr>4--09aP8Lu<br>
> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&<wbr>m=<wbr>xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4<wbr>roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP<br>
> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_<wbr>PoevFoFpI&e=<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ##############################<wbr>##############################<wbr>############<br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.<wbr>com/v2/url?u=https-3A__<wbr>listserv.slac.stanford.edu_<wbr>cgi-2Dbin</a><br>
> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-<wbr>26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=<wbr>lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI<wbr>4--09aP8Lu<br>
> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&<wbr>m=<wbr>xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4<wbr>roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP<br>
> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_<wbr>PoevFoFpI&e=<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>______________________________<wbr>______________________________<br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.<wbr>com/v2/url?u=https-3A__<wbr>listserv.slac.stanford.edu_<wbr>cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-<wbr>2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=<wbr>lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI<wbr>4--09aP8Lu18s&r=<wbr>0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=<wbr>nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3<wbr>zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=<wbr>cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4<wbr>B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ##############################<wbr>##############################<wbr>############<br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.<wbr>com/v2/url?u=https-3A__<wbr>listserv.slac.stanford.edu_<wbr>cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-<wbr>2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=<wbr>lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI<wbr>4--09aP8Lu18s&r=<wbr>0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=<wbr>nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3<wbr>zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=<wbr>cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4<wbr>B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Hps-analysis mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Hps-analysis@jlab.org">Hps-analysis@jlab.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis</a><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Hps-analysis mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Hps-analysis@jlab.org">Hps-analysis@jlab.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list<br>
><br>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=J4PP6Zl8IyGHpsqWaKegORCYw8hoCHePTw5O95a5lqQ&m=wjwyjecRC5s1gczOiYgHq8iy4pq_DUT9rfNaLZry_mI&s=HXqCKEp3mZFG2gAIHL-fSSgYiVaga1okA4S18Qgjafk&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.slac.<wbr>stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?<wbr>SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>