<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello Matt and Nathan,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think we should not too much favor the very specialized meetings, which are attended by fewer people, over the more general ones too much. It will be difficult for many of us to attend the bump-hunt <i class="">and </i>the vertex/BH meeting, but we may just be able to tune in regularly for the analysis meeting. So if that can be kept in mind, in other words, if the analysis meeting can remain current, then I see no problem with your suggestion.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best,</div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Maurik</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 21, 2017, at 5:10 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <<a href="mailto:mgraham@slac.stanford.edu" class="">mgraham@slac.stanford.edu</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><br class="">Hi All, <br class=""><br class="">We will not have analysis meeting and, with a lot of the in-depth stuff going to the individual vertex/BH group meeting the thought is that we will go to bi-weekly meetings in the future. Any objections? Concurrences? <br class=""><br class="">Matt & Nathan<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Hps-analysis mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Hps-analysis@jlab.org" class="">Hps-analysis@jlab.org</a><br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>