[Hps-ecal] Calorimeter Status

[Sho Uemura]

On slide 6 it would be good to say that while there is this 32 ns dead 
time, that is usually insignificant compared to the dead time associated 
with the input signal staying above threshold.

The FADC will not see a second pulse unless there has been time for the 
signal to fall back below threshold; this time depends on the threhsold 
and the first hit's amplitude but will very often be greater than 32 ns.

On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Garcon Michel wrote:

> Kyle,
>
>                In addition to Stepan's remarks :
>
> -          One understands which one applies at any time, but avoid confusion between volt, energy and ADC value when talking about the pulse shape.
>
> -          P.10 energy slope: Emin here is not the same as in the energy sum condition. Is it not min(Etop, Ebottom) ? And could you remind us (me) of the definition of Rmin ?
>
> -          Could you add a table of values of parameters used so far in your simulation for 2.2 and 6.6 GeV.
>
> -          In conclusion, a slide sketching the next steps of your work. Is it optimization of cuts using simulated data? Trigger rates and trigger efficiency for A' events ? Or else?
> Some of my remarks may stem from the fact that I am a newcomer in the game.
>
> Yours,
> Michel.
>
> _______________
> Michel Garçon
> Irfu/SPhN
> CEA-Saclay, bât. 703
> 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex
> France
> Tél.: +33 1 69 08 86 23
>
> Until October 31st, on leave at
> Jefferson Lab
> Office in CC-B129
> Phone : +1 757 269 7636
>
>